Skip to main content
Gifts from The Morning Star
Making music in the USSR

JONATHAN TAYLOR is intrigued by an account of the struggle of Soviet-era musicians to adapt to the strictures of social realism

Dmitri Shostakovich voting in the election of the Council of Administration of Soviet Musicians in Moscow in 1974 / Pic: Yuri Shcherbinin/CC

The Sound of Utopia: Musicians in the Time of Stalin
Michel Krielaars, Pushkin Press, £25



In 1948, Dmitri Shostakovich, Sergei Prokofiev, Aram Khachaturian and other prominent Soviet composers were attacked by Andrei Zhdanov, Joseph Stalin’s culture secretary. He accused them of “bourgeois formalism,” and demanded in its place “socialist realism” – an optimistic, conservative, accessible music for the people. The row was the culmination of years of friction between the regime and its composers – most famously, Shostakovich.

This is the backdrop to Michel Krielaars’s fascinating new book, The Sound of Utopia, which describes the fate of various classical and popular musicians during Stalin’s reign. They include the composers Sergei Prokofiev, Alexander Mossolov, Mieczyslaw Weinberg and Tikhon Khrennikov, the pianists Sviastoslav Richter and Maria Yudina, the popular singers Klavdiya Shulzhenko and Vadim Kozim, and the cellist Mstislav Rostropovich.

All of them fell foul of the authorities for one reason or another: Kozim because of his homosexuality, Weinberg because of his Jewishness, Yudina because of her outspoken religiosity, Khrennikov because of his dubious position as general secretary of the Composers’ Union, Rostropovich owing to his courageous defence of others.

If Shostakovich himself doesn’t feature as one of Krielaars’s case studies, his ghost still looms large throughout the book, as both friend of many, and as the musician with the most well-documented and fraught relationship with Stalin.

Like Shostakovich, all these musicians had ambivalent relationships with authority, navigating ways of (generally) surviving within the system. And not just surviving: as Krielaars suggests, they also somehow managed to produce “marvellous music” in a way that “is nothing short of miraculous... [It’s] as though a storm obliterates your house, and you just keep on planting potatoes in your field.” Despite the political storm surrounding them, these musicians kept on writing and performing music, attempting a compromise between self-expression and the strictures of socialist realism.

Krielaars suggests that, for all the noise and prosyletising, socialist realism was really a nebulous and “totally arbitrary” category, with “no connection to the music itself.” Its imposition was a “haphazard... policy,” which was “mostly determined by swings in cultural politics... fickleness of policymakers, factions within the bureaucracy and financial crises.”

Despite that haphazardness, or perhaps because of it, the policy had immense power. So musicians had to find ways of negotiating their own musical livelihoods in relation to demands of the state.

Prokofiev and Mossolov, for instance, attempted to reinvent their modernist styles into something more approachable, even Romantic – though, tragically, neither of them quite succeeded. The singer Kozim embraced a self-imposed exile to the distant provinces, even after the order to remain there seemed to have been rescinded. Weinberg eventually disappeared into a kind of psychological exile, shutting himself away from all but his friend Shostakovich. Rostropovich stood up for what he thought was right until the situation became untenable, and he defected to the West.

Khrennikov – the most ambivalent figure of all – seemed at once to embrace his status as party apparatchik, crushing other musicians’ careers, while, by other accounts, simultaneously shielding members of the Composers’ Union.

Krielaars himself admits that The Sound of Utopia is by no means a work of musicology and, in fact, the occasional analyses of music constitute its weakest aspect. As a cultural history of twentieth-century Stalinism, however, it is original and astute.

It also attempts to trace connections between Soviet culture and its ”harrowing parallels with modern-day Russia.” Towards the end of the book, Krielaars asserts that, in some respects, ”Russia seems to have reverted to the Stalin years.” As an example, he cites the now-banned Ukrainian composer Valentin Silvestrov, a 2022 concert of whose music was halted halfway through by the Moscow police. In the words of one Western singer-songwriter, it might well seem that “The Old Man’s Back Again.”

Jonathan Taylor is an author, editor, lecturer and critic. His most recent book is the memoir A Physical Education: On Bullying, Discipline & Other Lessons (Goldsmiths, 2024). He directs the MA in Creative Writing at the University of Leicester.

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
More from this author
Features / 11 November 2024
11 November 2024
At the start of National Anti-Bullying Week, JONATHAN TAYLOR explains that recognising the signs of bullying is the first step towards being able to do something about it
NAZI ASPIRATIONS: Wilhelm Furtwangler conducting the Berlin
Book Review / 15 February 2024
15 February 2024
JONATHAN TAYLOR excavates the paradox that underlies Burgess’s ambivalent attitude to music
Similar stories
PREMONITION OF DISASTER: Anonymous photographer, Fallen Stat
Book Review / 18 March 2025
18 March 2025
NICK WRIGHT delicately unpicks the eloquent writings on art of an intellectual pessimist who wears his Marxism lightly
LOST IN BOOKS: Fernando Pessoa sculpture by Jean-Michel Folo
Book Review / 31 October 2024
31 October 2024
FIONA O’CONNOR recommends a biography of a Portuguese modernist poet who maintained a philosophical approach to his own being and is best encountered within the playfulness of his writing
HERO'S WELCOME: Toasting Yuri Gagarin at the Society’s pre
Books / 18 October 2024
18 October 2024
CHRISTINE LINDEY marvels at a history of the Society for Cultural Relations with the USSR
WE LOVE THE RED SOCKS SONNYBOY: LSO, conducted by Gianandrea
Concert review / 2 July 2024
2 July 2024
SIMON DUFF is thrilled by the provocative pairing of two major works from a time of profound ideological opposition