ANGUS REID and MARIA DUARTE review The Courageous, The Cut, Christy, and On Swift Horses

Those Passions: On art and politics
TJ Clark, Thames and Hudson, £40
1848 – the year of European revolutions, the year Marx and Engels wrote The Manifesto of the Communist Party – marked a deep change in the ways in which bourgeois society came to be ruled and in the immediate years that followed, and conditioned by the same processes, realist painting became a thing.
The French state became active as a patron of art in a more overtly ideological and politically significant way than authority and class power had in previous eras. The distinctive feature of this endeavour was, for the French state and, by extension for the French nation, the promotion of a particular understanding of the Revolution.
In TJ Clark’s first two books – The Absolute Bourgeois: Artists and Politics in France 1848-1857 and Image of the People. Gustave Courbet and the 1848 Revolution – a generation of art historians found that – in the collision of art and politics and the interplay of painting and state power – there came a real understanding of the relationship between the profound if barely perceptible movement of the economy and what was happening in people’s heads. And what appeared on the walls of state institutions.

US tariffs have had Von der Leyen bowing in submission, while comments from the former European Central Bank leader call for more European political integration and less individual state sovereignty. All this adds up to more pain and austerity ahead, argues NICK WRIGHT

Starmer sabotaged Labour with his second referendum campaign, mobilising a liberal backlash that sincerely felt progressive ideals were at stake — but the EU was then and is now an entity Britain should have nothing to do with, explains NICK WRIGHT

Deep disillusionment with the Westminster cross-party consensus means rupture with the status quo is on the cards – bringing not only opportunities but also dangers, says NICK WRIGHT

Holding office in local government is a poisoned chalice for a party that bases its electoral appeal around issues where it has no power whatsoever, argues NICK WRIGHT