Skip to main content
Work with the NEU
Court of Appeal rules in favour of secret terrorism trial but allows defendants to be named
Core parts of trial of Erol Incedal and Mounir Rarmoul-Bouhadjar for terror offences to be held in secret after Court of Appeal calls it an 'exceptional case'

Key elements of a major terrorism trial can be held in secret for the first time, the Court of Appeal ruled yesterday.

The case is being brought by the Crown against terror suspects Erol Incedal and Mounir Rarmoul-Bouhadjar, who until now had been identified only as AB and CD.

Media organisations had contested the “unprecedented” decision by Mr Justice Nicol at the Old Bailey last month to accept the government’s application to have the trial heard entirely in secret, with a “permanent prohibition on reporting what takes place during the trial and their identities.”

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
Similar stories
HISTORY MADE: A plaque at the Old Bailey dedicated to the case of William Penn and William Mead — and the jury who acted on their conscience
Features / 2 September 2025
2 September 2025

The heroism of the jury who defied prison and starvation conditions secured the absolute right of juries to deliver verdicts based on conscience — a convention which is now under attack, writes MAT COWARD

FW Pomeroy's Statue of Justice stands atop the Central Criminal Court building, Old Bailey, London
Features / 9 August 2025
9 August 2025

ANSELM ELDERGILL examines the government’s proposals to further limit the right of citizens to trial by jury