Skip to main content
Morning Star Conference
Policing: by consent or coercion?
The unnecessarily violent police intervention at a Quaker place of worship is a PR disaster and will only serve to deepen the chasm between them and the public. SYMON HILL reports

THE police raid on a Quaker place of worship last week was not about preventing crime or arresting criminals. It was an attempt to intimidate peaceful protesters. It will not succeed.

At about 7.15pm on Thursday March 27, at least 20 police officers broke down the door of Westminster Quaker Meeting House in St Martin’s Lane in London. They could have just rung the doorbell.

The police, some armed with tasers, charged into a room where the non-violent protest group Youth Demand were holding a welcome talk. Women in their late teens and early twenties were grabbed and handcuffed behind their backs.

They swarmed through the rest of the building, entering every room, including one that had been hired by a life drawing class and even a room where a private counselling session was taking place.

This horrific incident was made possible by the draconian anti-protest laws introduced by the previous Tory government and maintained by their Labour successors. The police reportedly used the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act as they arrested six women. The youngest was 18.

When the Act was passed in 2022, we were told that the police would use it only in extreme situations. That promise is now as broken as Westminster Meeting House’s door.

In their media statement, the Metropolitan Police said that Youth Demand are planning civil disobedience in London. In recent years there has been a noticeable increase in campaigners being arrested for things they are only talking about doing. Even so, this went further.

This Youth Demand gathering was a welcome talk. It was a public event, open to people who had never even considered engaging in civil disobedience before. The police arrested other Youth Demand members in London and Exeter on the same day.

The police’s thuggery seems designed to intimidate Youth Demand from going ahead with their plans for April. The police may hope that the publicity around the raid will deter others from joining in.

Typically, the police have seriously underestimated the determination of people whose rights are denied.

Tessa, a member of Youth Demand, said after her release on Friday that “this blatant act of intimidation” would not stop them going ahead with actions in April to resist the British government’s military support for genocide in Gaza.

This incident should serve as a wake-up call to anyone still in denial about the suppression of peaceful protest in Britain.  Anyone who thought that the police would think twice before smashing their way into a place of worship has been disillusioned.

Of course, the raid would have been immoral and outrageous whatever building it had taken place in. And I am certainly not suggesting that activities in religious buildings should be immune from scrutiny. However, the police’s disregard for the nature of the venue shows that their contempt for religious liberty is on a level with their hostility to free speech and freedom of assembly.

Hours after the raid had taken place, Quakers nationally issued a statement condemning “an aggressive violation of our place of worship.”

Quakers – also known as the Religious Society of Friends – refuse to separate the “sacred” from the “secular,” so they do not believe their buildings to be more sacred than other places. But like many other religious groups, Quakers want their buildings to be places of safety and welcome. Those who visit them should be able to expect this. 

This is why apologists for the police are missing the point when they emphasise that the arrested individuals were not Quakers. This is irrelevant. Quakers — who will rent rooms only to peaceful groups — may no longer be able to assure people using their buildings that they are in a safe space. Westminster Meeting House is also the home of two Quaker wardens, whose home has been violated.

Speaking personally, Westminster Quaker Meeting House was a place of welcome and community to me after I moved to London 20 years ago. I have since moved away from London, and to some extent away from Quakerism, but Westminster Quaker Meeting House holds a special place in my heart. As Quaker friends and acquaintances of mine condemned the raid on social media, I realised how many of them I had met for the first time in that building.

Paul Parker, the Recording Clerk of Quakers in Britain, said on Friday that nobody had been arrested in a Quaker Meeting House in Britain “in living memory.” It may be that such a thing has not happened since World War I, when there were cases of peace activists being arrested in Quaker venues.

In the 17th century, however, arrests at Quaker meetings were very common. In 1661, Charles II suppressed meetings of groups including Quakers and Baptists who were seen as hostile to royalist government.

The Quaker Act of 1662 banned more than five adults from meeting for worship. Yet however many were imprisoned, the meetings still happened. In Reading, Quaker children held Meetings for Worship after the adults were arrested. When Horsleydown Quaker Meeting House was demolished by the authorities, Quakers met for worship the next day amid the ruins.

I am not suggesting that the situation is as bad as then. But while the people arrested were not Quakers, the authorities have again violated a place of worship to intimidate peaceful people from acting on their conscience.

On Sunday, there was an unusually high turnout at Westminster Quaker Meeting when people turned up to show solidarity and to keep the Meeting House running. On Thursday, Quakers are planning to hold a Meeting for Worship outside Scotland Yard.

People of all faiths and none need to show their solidarity with Youth Demand and with the Quakers. This time the police raided a Quaker Meeting House. Next time it could be a church, temple, synagogue or mosque.

 

 

Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
More from this author
Symon Hill (right) and (left) an anti-monarchy protest
Features / 10 March 2025
10 March 2025
The police have finally admitted it was totally illegal to arrest me for simply asking who elected King Charles — my ordeal has opened my eyes to the plight of free speech and the right to protest in Britain, writes SYMON HILL
The Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby, March 31, 2024
Features / 21 December 2024
21 December 2024
Behind headlines of bishops’ resignations and brutal abuse lies the deeper story of class privilege and power, as religious institutions face a stark choice between serving the elite or standing with the oppressed, writes SYMON HILL
Windows are smashed as trouble flares during an anti-immigra
Features / 8 August 2024
8 August 2024
Far right claims to be ‘standing up for Christian Britain’ are false and aimed at stoking up hate – but Christians must step forward and loudly speak out against them, says SYMON HILL
Secretary of State for Defence Grant Shapps, speaks to Chief
Features / 2 February 2024
2 February 2024
It may be risible to see 59-year-old Boris Johnson offer to sign up to do battle with Russia, but this is all part of a carefully constructed rise in the acceptability of warmongering that we must expose and reject, writes SYMON HILL