Skip to main content
Work with the NEU
Majority of people crossing Channel would be granted asylum, government figures show
A group of people are brought in to Dungeness, Kent, onboard an RNLI Dungeness Lifeboat, following a small boat incident in the Channel, August 19, 2023

A MAJORITY of people who have crossed the Channel on small boats this year would be recognised as refugees if their application had been processed, analysis of government figures shows.

Contradicting ministers’ claims that most people crossing the Channel do not need protection, the report by the Refugee Council, released today, found that 74 per cent of those who have crossed the Channel this year – or 14,648 people – would be granted asylum in normal circumstances.

The study also found that once the Illegal Migration Act is fully enforced only 3.5 per cent of people arriving would be returned to their home countries every year.

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
Similar stories
Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood speaking after Lucy Powell is announced as the new Deputy Leader of the Labour Party at an event in central London. Picture date: Saturday October 25, 2025
Human Rights / 29 November 2025
29 November 2025

DIANE ABBOTT warns that Shabana Mahmood’s draconian asylum proposals fuel racist scapegoating and risk demoralising Labour’s base – potentially paving the way for Farage to No 10

COMPASSION: A protest outside Downing Street calling for more safe and legal routes for refugees to enter Britain and claim asylum, November 2021
Features / 5 September 2025
5 September 2025

Britain’s proud asylum history, from sheltering the Kindertransport escaping Hitler to Basque children fleeing fascist Spain, required tireless campaigning against persistent opposition — and it’s up to all of us to do our part today, writes SABINA PRICE

Channel Migrants
Features / 9 May 2025
9 May 2025

Secret consultation documents finally released after the Morning Star’s two-year freedom of information battle show the Home Office misrepresented public opinion, claiming support for policies that most respondents actually strongly criticised as dangerous and unfair, writes SOLOMON HUGHES