Skip to main content
Advertise with the Morning Star
The dangers of medicalising gender
SONYA ANDERMAHR admires a candid history of the NHS service and its mistreatment of young people with gender dysphoria
[Ted Eyton/CC]

Time to Think
Hannah Barnes, Swift Press, £20

“ARE we hurting children?” is the question that lies at the heart of this timely and meticulously researched investigation into the medical scandal at the Tavistock and Portman Trust’s Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS).

The service opened in 1989 to provide talking therapies to young people struggling with their gender identity. Treatment initially consisted of careful and lengthy exploration of the issues and family counselling in a supportive setting. It involved small numbers of patients, mainly boys, who exhibited gender incongruence before puberty. Most of these boys desisted and grew up to be gay. 

By the time of the announcement of the clinic’s closure last year, the number of young people being treated had skyrocketed into the thousands; the vast majority, representing a rise of over 4,000 per cent, were now teenage girls exhibiting extreme distress and complex problems. 

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
Similar stories
Why we need the return of women’s centres
Features / 6 October 2025
6 October 2025

In the face of funding cuts, closures and a shift into women’s centres providing criminal justice-only services rather than a holistic approach, RUTH HUNT urges women to protect existing resources, volunteer and build new networks of support

RADICAL: Greta Thunberg urges MEPs to show climate leadershi
Books / 3 April 2025
3 April 2025
JOHN GREEN explores the argument that psychiatry needs to move away from the idea of just seeing and treating the individual
Britain / 11 December 2024
11 December 2024
VICTIM BLAMING: Kemi Badenoch has never met a disadvantaged
Features / 31 October 2024
31 October 2024
The dangerous rhetoric around neurodiversity from the Conservative leadership candidate threatens hard-won protections and social progress, writes CAILEAN McBRIDE