Latest editorial
FW Pomeroy's Statue of Justice on top of the Central Criminal Court building, Old Bailey, London
A LEADING barrister won a Court of Appeal bid today over a contempt of court allegation from his closing speech in a Palestine Action criminal damage trial.
Rajiv Menon was accused of misleading the jury and ignoring the trial judge’s directions when representing one of six activists who invaded the British site of Israeli defence firm Elbit Systems in January.
Three Court of Appeal judges have ruled in Mr Menon’s favour, finding that trial judge Mr Justice Johnson did not have the power to refer the contempt allegation directly to the High Court.
The case has been sent back to the judge to consider the next steps.
Solicitor Jenny Wiltshire said: “This unprecedented attempt to criminalise lawyers for doing their job and representing their clients fearlessly should never be repeated.”
Mr Menon, who worked on the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry, the Hillsborough inquests and the Grenfell Tower Inquiry, had delivered a closing speech referencing a plaque at the Old Bailey setting out the right of juries to give verdicts according to their convictions.
At a retrial, four activists were found guilty of criminal damage and are due to be sentenced on June 12. Two others were found not guilty.
Former judge ANSELM ELDERGILL examines the details and controversy of Lucy Letby’s trial and appeal in the context of famous historical wrongful convictions that prove both the justice system and legal activists make errors
The heroism of the jury who defied prison and starvation conditions secured the absolute right of juries to deliver verdicts based on conscience — a convention which is now under attack, writes MAT COWARD
ANSELM ELDERGILL examines the government’s proposals to further limit the right of citizens to trial by jury