Skip to main content
Work with the NEU
Who’s to blame?

Nothing, says ANDY HEDGECOCK, can rescue this undistinguished amalgam of ponderous melodrama and shallow philosophical speculation

Noah Jupe and Bill Nighy in &sons [Pic: IMDb]

& Sons (15)
Directed by Pablo Trapero
⭑⭑☆☆☆



NEITHER the deranged grandeur of Bill Nighy as a feted but reclusive author, nor the restrained emotional depth of Imelda Staunton as his ex-wife can rescue this undistinguished amalgam of ponderous melodrama and shallow philosophical speculation.

The film begins as a mundane and cliched tale of a wealthy but dysfunctional family. Self-pitying and irascible, Andrew Dyer (Nighy) spends his days in an alcohol-fuelled miasma, watched over by his youngest son, Andy (Noah Jupe) and Czech housekeeper Gerde (Anna Geislerova). Convinced his death is imminent, Andrew summons his two eldest sons to his sprawling mansion.

Screenwriter and recovering addict Richard (Johnny Flynn) and budding documentary-maker Jamie (George MacKay) resent their father’s treatment of their mother, particularly his (supposed) infidelity and the subsequent birth of their (apparent) half-brother, Andy. The bracketed hedge phrases are necessary because, 38 minutes into the film, Dyer reveals an alternative explanation of Andy’s conception and identity.

Suddenly there’s a chance the plot will veer into science fiction (naming the specific subgenre would constitute a significant spoiler). Some characters accept Dyer’s story; others dismiss it as a pathetic attempt to evade responsibility for his unfaithfulness. The matter is resolved in the film’s closing seconds. 

The Dyers are a network of exploitative opportunism. Andrew took advantage of Richard when gathering material for his literary masterpiece. Richard promotes his scripts by promising access to his father. Jamie films intimate and distressing events in the service of his art. There are hints that Gerde is executing a plot of her own.   

Without exception, the central and supporting cast are outstanding. Sadly, the storytelling is diffuse, pretentious and eminently dull.

There are two major problems. Firstly, themes are addressed through dialogue, which creates a “stagey” vibe and destroys the impetus of the plot.

Secondly, the film is overstuffed with ideas — nature versus nurture; the ethics of science; the responsibilities of the artist; genetic and cultural immortality; toxic masculinity; and the nebulous notions of identity, authorship and originality. Each of these deserves focused scrutiny rather than the cursory glance afforded by a script that has bitten off more than it can chew.  

In cinemas August 21.

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
Similar stories
round up
Cinema / 20 August 2026
20 August 2026
fotw
Film of the Week / 30 July 2026
30 July 2026

MARIA DUARTE recommends a remarkable study of the friendship between a Palestinian and a Pakistani, broken by a hostile state

round up
Cinema / 23 July 2026
23 July 2026

ANGUS REID, ANDY HEDGECOCK and MARIA DUARTE review On The Sea, A Useful Ghost, Brunello: The Gracious Visionary, and Pinocchio Unstrung

round up
Cinema / 19 December 2025
19 December 2025

ANDY HEDGECOCK, MARIA DUARTE and ANGUS REID review The Six Billion Dollar Man, Avatar: Fire and Ash, Goodbye June, and Super Elfkins