Skip to main content
Morning Star Conference
Wishful thinking
WILL PODMORE is disappointed by a credibility-stretching analysis of Scottish nationalist politics
POLARISED OPINION: A rally outside the Scottish Parliament in Edinburgh following the decision by judges at the UK Supreme Court in London that the Scottish Parliament does not have the power to hold a second independence referendum, November 23 2022

A nation in crisis: division, conflict and capitalism in the United Kingdom
Neville Kirk
Bloomsbury Academic £21.99

NEVILLE KIRK, emeritus professor of Social and Labour History at Manchester Metropolitan University, takes a look at political events in Britain from late 2016 to July 2022.

Kirk covers economic crisis, struggles over Brexit, the elections of 2017 and 2019, and Scottish politics. He examines how the Conservative, Labour and Scottish National parties behaved in these years, using a wide range of source materials.

He makes his position clear from the start: “Some, including the present author, maintain that left-of-centre ‘radical Scottishness’ in the form of the movement for Scottish independence and its desire to create of [sic] a fairer and more egalitarian society, now constitutes the main challenger and possible alternative to hegemonic Conservatism.”

But talk of fairness and equality is cheap. Indeed, reaction easily uses these: Boris Johnson set up the Department for Levelling Up, and Theresa May talked of the Conservatives being “for the many.” Liberal rhetoric can be appropriated, precisely because it is so flabby.

When Kirk writes of “the catastrophe of Brexit” and of “the failed Scottish referendum of September 18 2014” he decries populism, always referring to it as “right-wing populism.”

In 2018 a leading SNP member, George Kerevan, pointed out that 500,000 voters had deserted his party between the 2015 and 2017 general elections. “Because,” he says “they lost faith in our ability to oppose Tory austerity and deliver a better life in concrete terms.”

The SNP indeed proved unable to protect Scotland from the effects of Conservative rule.
 
Kirk writes: “The Union, furthermore, was believed to afford preferential treatment to the people of Scotland, vis-a-vis other UK subjects, in terms of comparatively lower levels of taxation, higher levels of public spending per head of population and the running, without any immediate costs, of a high budget deficit.”

“Believed”? Surely this is a question a fair-minded historian should seek to answer. But he doesn’t because, as he knows, it is true.

As a report from the Centre for Economic Performance concluded, separation would leave Scotland considerably poorer. Separation would also make Scotland less influential.

Scotland’s population of 5.5 million is 8 per cent of the UK’s (and only 1.8 per cent of the EU population). How can anyone believe that Scotland would have more power as part of the EU than as part of the UK?

Kirk admits that the SNP played dirty in its attacks on the Labour Party: “Sturgeon was wrong in her claim that Jeremy Corbyn’s opposition to cheap immigrant labour carried ‘echoes’ of the racism of Nigel Farage.” The crucial point, conveniently bypassed by Sturgeon and the SNP, was that Corbyn viewed cheapness as an economic, class-based phenomenon rather than a racial one.

Kirk’s first forecast was that “Johnson’s practice and vision constituted the most obvious and popular way out of UK capitalism’s ongoing and most challenging combined crisis of modern times.” He admits that this conclusion “is no longer valid.”

He acknowledges that “the polls taken since 2014 — almost 90 of them — conclusively showed that there had been little, if any, consistent and significant change in support for an independent Scotland.”

Events since he wrote this book, mainly Sturgeon’s forced resignation and the SNP’s steady self-destruction, have proved him wrong too.

How many people in Scotland would now agree with him about “the proven efficiency and competence of SNP governments”?

This book is marred by the author’s wishful thinking, derived from his biases against British independence and support for Scottish separatism. It is an example of reaction in progressive clothing.

 

Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
More from this author
A MAN FOR ALL SEASONS: (L to R) Church of St Mary Magdalene
Books / 13 March 2025
13 March 2025
WILL PODMORE recommends an excellent and useful introduction to a lesser-known giant of the scientific revolution in Britain
EVOLUTION OF GOTHIC FROM ISLAMIC: Arches of the former mosqu
Books / 5 February 2025
5 February 2025
WILL PODMORE is enthralled by the convincing case that guilds of Islamic craftsmen were responsible for the European gothic style
GROOMED TO RULE: Eton College pupils taking part in the ‘P
Books / 5 January 2025
5 January 2025
WILL PODMORE is intrigued by a study the British ruling class that follows statistical analysis with totally inadequate proposals for change
RATIONAL FUTURE: Passenger and freight train on the West Coa
Books / 6 December 2024
6 December 2024
WILL PODMORE welcomes a demonstration of the incomparable virtues of rail travel, and the political obstacles to realising its potential 
Similar stories
MOST DIVISIVE OF ISSUES: Migrants are brought in to Dover, K
Books / 27 November 2024
27 November 2024
WILL PODMORE welcomes a well-written and pacey account of the run-up to the 2024 general election
Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Scottish Labour Leader Anas Sar
Voices of Scotland / 14 October 2024
14 October 2024
Under Starmer and Sarwar, both the UK and Scottish Labour Parties are committed to the dogmas of neoliberalism – although signs are that resistance is growing, argues VINCE MILLS
Features / 17 September 2024
17 September 2024
The independence referendum’s youthful energy has dissipated, leaving Holyrood disconnected from voters as the constitutional question fades and Labour gains ground from a stagnant SNP, writes COLL MCCAIL
PROMISING BEGINNING? Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar with
Features / 6 July 2024
6 July 2024
STEPHEN LOW looks at an election in Scotland that, for the first time in a decade, wasn’t a fight about flags