Skip to main content
Donate to the 95 years appeal
A disastrous divide
INDIE PURCELL sees a play on a dystopian future where the sexes are kept separate sink into a chasm of conceptual cliche
Impressive: Erin Doherty as Soween [Manuel Harlan]

The Divide
The Old Vic, London

YOU'D be forgiven if you walked out of watching Alan Ayckbourn's The Divide vowing never to go to the theatre again.

Cut down from the original six-hour marathon, this four-hour epic dystopian tale, set over 100 years into the future, is full of so many mixed messages and insulting cliches it's hard to grasp Ayckbourn's point.

It's set in a post-apocalyptic society where, following an infectious plague carried by women, the sexes are kept mostly separate. Women live in the south and men in the north, same-sex relationships are the norm, heterosexuality is forbidden and children are the product of artificial insemination.

The protagonist is the child Soween (Erin Doherty, by far the strongest actor in the production) who recounts the history of the divide and her part in its eventual collapse.

She narrates her experiences via diary extracts and letters which tell of her romantic crushes for her friends Axi and the free-spirited Giella and it's a pretty compelling love story. The focus then switches to her teen brother-narrator Elihu, who'll be sent off to live with the men once he turns 18, and his illegal affair with Giella, Soween’s object of affection.

It's sort of like Romeo and Juliet — but a badly written and overly long sci-fi version of it — with an impressive, if incredibly corny, onstage choir.

Elihu and Giella’s relationship is discovered and they are punished for it, while everyone else is disenchanted with the world of the “divide.” Society collapses, leaving Soween to marry her brother’s nice-but-incredibly-dim man friend. By the eventual end, everything returns to 2018.

The main problem with The Divide is not necessarily the length — although it certainly does warrant further cutting — it's more that, while it has the potential to be an interesting dissection of relationships, exploring sexual politics and challenging gender stereotypes, it does the opposite.

It’s almost as if Ayckbourn has thought up a narrative to hit out at gender and relationship categorisation and then backed out 15 minutes in.

It’s not all awful. Laura Hopkins design is striking and stylish, while director Annabel Bolton creates a dark and intense atmosphere, capturing the mood perfectly.

But with its thin plot and underdeveloped characters, the audience is left with no more than a script full of trite lines in a play full of cliched concepts.

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
More from this author
Music Review / 17 January 2023
17 January 2023
L-R Toyin Ayedun-Alase as Chatter and Nkhanise Phiri as Alic
Theatre Review / 12 December 2022
12 December 2022
Theatre Review / 8 September 2022
8 September 2022
While the subject matter is sobering and serious, this isn't your run-of-the-mill polemic, write INDIE PURCELL
Drawing: Catel Muller
Book Review / 21 August 2022
21 August 2022
An absolute must for those who love film and graphic novels, writes INDIANNA PURCELL
Similar stories
IMPASSIONED: Phoebe Thomas and Matt Whitchurch / Pic: Ellie Kurttz
Theatre review / 25 May 2025
25 May 2025

SIMON PARSONS is taken by a thought provoking and intelligent play performed with great sensitivity

CO-DEPENDENCY: Rex Ryan and Lauren Farrell in Men's Business
Theatre Review / 27 March 2025
27 March 2025
MAYER WAKEFIELD is chilled by the co-dependency of two lost souls as portrayed by German communist playwright Franz Xaver Kroetz
RAVISSANT! 12. Romola Garai, Gina McKee, Deborah Findlay, Ha
Theatre review / 7 February 2025
7 February 2025
MARY CONWAY recommends a beautifully judged performance that shines a light on the experience of all female war babies and boomers
PINKIE PROMISE: Nell Barlow and Amelie Abbott in Never Let M
Theatre Review / 7 November 2024
7 November 2024
SIMON PARSONS applauds a moving version of Ishiguro’s vision of a world in which science and ethics have diverged