Skip to main content
Morning Star Conference
Fake legal letters: Loan shark Wonga avoids potential fraud charges with compensation deal
Labour MP Stella Creasy leads calls for high-interest loans company to be charged

Loan shark Wonga wriggled free from potential fraud charges yesterday by striking a deal to compensate thousands of customers threatened with fake legal letters. 

Wonga faces £2.6 million in compensation claims after the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) found it used “unfair and misleading” tactics to chase 45,000 people for debt.

The regulator revealed extra administration charges were piled onto customer’s huge bills for letters from non-existent solicitors threatening legal action. 

But Walthamstow Labour MP Stella Creasy led calls for criminal charges to be brought against the high-interest loans company. 

Ms Creasy said she found it “deeply concerning” that “government regulators have known about this issue since 2011 but it has taken so long for any action.

“Despite these behaviours being potentially a criminal matter under the Administration of Justice Act the police do not seem to be involved,” she added.

But the FCA revealed that it is powerless to take action because the offences took place before the regulator had been set up. 

A spokeswoman told the Star that the FCA could not act retrospectively on misconduct that occurred before it was established earlier this year. 

It said the Office for Fair Trading — the body the FCA replaced — had been responsible for the case before being shut down by the Con-Dem government in April. 

A spokesman for the Crown Prosecution Service also told the Star that the FCA’s hands were tied. 

And tax expert Richard Murphy said it was that the clear the “government has created a clean slate for Wonga.”

The Tax Research UK spokesman said this meant that Wonga had effectively committed fraud and got away with it. 

“It has deceived customers to obtain financial advantage,” he added.

Wonga bosses offered “unreserved” apologies yesterday but campaigners were unmoved. 

Occupy Wonga pledged to ramp up its campaign against the payday lender in light of the revelation with a series of demonstrations against the company. 

“It is criminal what they are doing,” said Occupy Wonga organiser Janie Mac.

She said Wonga’s “intimidation actions are no different from 40 years ago when loan lenders were knocking on council house doors on benefit day.”

Unite Community organiser Liane Groves called on the government to “bring in some proper regulation to stop Wonga “preying on the vulnerable” and “ripping people off” once more. 

Forged legal threats are not the first controversy to hit Wonga. 

Earlier this year the company, which counts the Church of England as one of its main shareholders, admitted to overcalculating balances of more than 200,000 customers. 

In recent months both Wonga’s chief executive Niall Wass and its chairman and founder Errol Damelin have quit the company.

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
More from this author
Britain / 24 June 2016
24 June 2016
Britain / 24 June 2016
24 June 2016
Britain / 23 June 2016
23 June 2016
Delegates hold silence and call for normalising of LGBT love
Similar stories
Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves at the Confederati
Features / 9 January 2025
9 January 2025
Labour’s ex-banker Chancellor plans deregulation while City profits soar and customers suffer — between money laundering scandals and the exploitation of Covid loans, it’s clearly time to end this madness, says BERNIE EVANS
Business and Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds leaving Downi
Features / 11 October 2024
11 October 2024
Jonathan Reynolds’ appearance at a Starling Bank-sponsored event speaks volumes about Labour’s attitude to financial regulation, as the bank faces criticism over Covid loan fraud and money laundering failures, writes SOLOMON HUGHES
Features / 15 August 2024
15 August 2024
The sad thing about the fibs being told about ‘green’ hydrogen heating our homes is that there are indeed green, energy-conserving avenues we could explore, but these diversions only obscure them, writes SOLOMON HUGHES