Skip to main content
NEU job vacancy
Yesterday’s future
Orwell’s 1984 was both timely and prophetic; this feminist reworking is well-written but inconsequential, writes CHRIS MOSS
WHAT ROT: Suzanna Hamilton and John Hurt in Michael Radford’s 1984 [IMDb]

Julia
Sandra Newman, Granta, £18.99

MANY people read George Orwell’s 1984 at school before they’ve come across other literary dystopias. Given the unrelenting, very English gloom that pervades it, chances are it puts them off the genre for good. 

Savvy teachers talk up the author’s inventiveness in coining terms like Newspeak, Big Brother, the Ministry of Truth, Ingsoc etc. These have novelty value when first encountered and provoke debate, but have become cliches through overexposure. Orwell’s prescience as regards surveillance is obvious, but its restating has become tiresome and simplistic. 

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
Similar stories
American flags representing the 200,000 dead from COVID-19 p
Book Review / 25 March 2025
25 March 2025
SARAH TROTT explores short fictional slices of life in the American midwest from a middle-aged and mostly female perspective
Literature / 25 March 2025
25 March 2025
JESSICA WIDNER explores how the twin themes of violence and love run through the novels of South Korean Nobel prize-winner Han Kang
Cartoon: JAY
Features / 28 February 2025
28 February 2025
While German leaders talk independence and even the Tories promise to speak truth to America, the Labour leader grovelled before a president whose comments he once called ‘absolutely repugnant,’ writes PETER KENWORTHY
INEQUALITIES EXPOSED: Joshua-Alexander Williams as Blue and
Theatre Review / 14 February 2025
14 February 2025
PAUL DONOVAN applauds an adaptation that draws out the contemporary relevance of George Orwell’s satire