Internationalism is deeply embedded in socialist theory and practice. Examination illuminates its complexity asserts the Marx Memorial Library and Workers’ School
THE Employment Rights Bill begins its passage through the House of Lords today. At 300 pages in length, spiced up by 250 government amendments in the Commons, it remains thin gruel, leaving trade unions, like Oliver Twist, asking for more — in the shape of a second industrial relations Bill during this parliament.
The Bill is a long way short of the full (but hardly gastronomic) menu in Labour’s green paper, A New Deal for Working People, drafted by a committee composed mostly of trade union leaders under Andy McDonald MP and adopted by Labour conference in 2021, reaffirmed in 2022, and loudly proclaimed by the leader and deputy leader on many occasions since.
Of course, the hunger for more does not detract from the gratitude the movement feels at a Bill of fare which will remove the Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Act 2024, and most (but not all) of the Trade Union Act 2016 — and do a lot more besides. But restaurant critics are surely entitled to judge the meal on how it measures up to the menu on the door rather than compare it to the starvation rations offered by the previous management.
The unions are unhappy with the Employment Rights Act 2025 and with good reason. KEITH EWING and Lord JOHN HENDY KC take a close look at why the Bill promised more than it delivered
The biggest strike in global history is a template for our future. The silence tells you all you need to know, writes CLAUDIA WEBBE
Labour’s watered-down legislation won’t protect us from unfair dismissal or ban some zero-hours contracts until 2027 — leaving millions of young people vulnerable to the populist right’s appeal, warns TUC young workers chair FRASER MCGUIRE
Labour must not allow unelected members of the upper house to erode a single provision of the Employment Rights Bill, argues ANDY MCDONALD MP



