ALEX HALL is disgusted by the misuse of ‘emotional narratives’ to justify uninformed geo-political prejudice
How to tell the woods from the trees
While comparison is a critical part of human cognition, when it becomes false or fatuous it leads to unhealthy competition and ineffective problem-solving, says ANDY HEDGECOCK

Bullsh*t Comparisons
Andrew Brooks
Footnote, £16.99
CRITICAL thinking is a dangerous theme for blurb writers, especially when the word “bullsh*t” is used in a title. Andrew Brooks’ latest book provides a trenchant and timely critique of an increasingly common form of sloppy thinking. Sadly, it fails to fulfil a spectacular claim on its dustjacket: I have not been empowered to “spot bullsh*t at twenty paces.”
The identification of misleading information is an increasingly important skill and — as Brooks demonstrates through his entertaining and clearly argued examples — one that can be learned.
There’s a caveat here: developing an ability to challenge deception and deliberately contrived ambiguity is only possible if we are properly informed on the issue under discussion.
More from this author

While the group known as the Colourists certainly reinvigorated Scottish painting, a new show is a welcome chance to reassess them, writes ANGUS REID

ANGUS REID recommends an exquisite drama about the disturbing impact of the one child policy in contemporary China

The phrase “cruel to be kind” comes from Hamlet, but Shakespeare’s Prince didn’t go in for kidnap, explosive punches, and cigarette deprivation. Tam is different.

ANGUS REID deconstructs a popular contemporary novel aimed at a ‘queer’ young adult readership