Skip to main content
NEU job advert
Christine Lindey's art exhibitions of the year

THE centenary of the Russian Revolution provided cultural institutions with a theme which was interpreted in questionable ways.

By far the worst was the Royal Academy’s exhibition Revolution: Russian Art 1917-1932. Favoured by an enviably generous budget and excellent connections with post-Soviet Russian institutions, it gathered an impressive body of art and design, some being virtually unknown in Britain.

But rather than explaining the Soviet artists’ socially committed motivations, a vindictive curatorial approach shamefully contextualised the works in didactic attacks on the revolution’s ideals and achievements, reminiscent of liverish 1920s Russian emigres fretting over their lost fortunes.

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
Similar stories
ihf
Exhibition review / 16 May 2025
16 May 2025

KEN COCKBURN assesses the art of Ian Hamilton Finlay for the experience of warfare it incited and represents

CONFRONTING HOMOPHOBIA: (L) FCB Cadell, The Boxer, c.1924; (
Exhibition review / 21 March 2025
21 March 2025
While the group known as the Colourists certainly reinvigorated Scottish painting, a new show is a welcome chance to reassess them, writes ANGUS REID
PREMONITION OF DISASTER: Anonymous photographer, Fallen Stat
Book Review / 18 March 2025
18 March 2025
NICK WRIGHT delicately unpicks the eloquent writings on art of an intellectual pessimist who wears his Marxism lightly
(L to R) Vincent van Gogh, Bedroom in Arles, 1889; Hew Locke
Culture / 30 December 2024
30 December 2024
From van Gogh to Sonia Boyce, from Hew Locke to Patrick Carpenter and... Pablo Picasso