Skip to main content
An ongoing Soviet inspiration
There's something to learn from the USSR's cultural policies, not least its promotion of working-class participation in the arts which has had an impact in Britain, says CHRISTINE LINDEY
Ruby Loftus screwing a breech ring

SOCIALLY and politically, the impact of  the 1917 Bolshevik revolution and creation of the USSR cannot be overestimated. Yet the impact of Soviet art on its British counterpart in the inter-war years and beyond has been undervalued for, while it directly inspired only a minority of British artists and was disparaged by many, the aesthetic and social issues it raised still provoke much debate in art circles.
    
Initially, Bolshevik experiments such as El Lissitsky and Lyubov Popova’s abstractions made little impact on the rather insular 1920s British art world. But in the early 1930s, avant-garde artists Barbara Hepworth and Ben Nicholson were obliquely influenced by Soviet abstraction through their membership of the international Abstraction-Creation Group which included Soviet artists.
    
Yet some socially committed artists were troubled by the international avant-garde’s focus on formal innovations, which they saw as individualist elitism which ignored artists’ social responsibility.

They were also appalled by Britain’s mass unemployment and dire social inequalities which contrasted unfavourably with the new worker state’s socio-political achievements. In the early 1930s a few including Cliff Rowe, Betty Rea, Misha Black and Pearl Binder set off for the USSR to see for themselves.
    
They discovered a dynamic and pluralist art world, where some Marxist artists energetically opposed their own avant-garde’s obscure “abstract concoctions.” Arguing for an accessible, forward-looking art, in 1922 they founded the influential Association of Artists for Revolutionary Russia (AKhRR).

Its realist art celebrated working-class achievements through depictions of contemporary Soviet life in its revolutionary development. Precursors of the method of socialist realism adopted in 1934, their styles ranged from Isaak Brodsky’s precise realism to Alexandr Deineka’s and Kusma Petrov-Vodkin’s moderate absorption of modernism, all of which were readily understandable.
    
Some British artists had reservations about the styles of Soviet art but all were impressed by Soviet cultural policies. Unlike capitalist societies, which cast artists as individualist outsiders competing for inadequate patronage, the USSR integrated art and artists into society.

Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
More from this author
AIA
Exhibition Review / 7 November 2024
7 November 2024
CHRISTINE LINDEY welcomes a fascinating survey of the work of the communist and socialist artists who founded the AIA in the 1930s
exp web 1
Exhibition review / 28 June 2024
28 June 2024
CHRISTINE LINDEY guides us through the vivid expressionism of a significant but apolitical group of pre WWI artists in Germany
entangled 1
Exhibition review / 7 March 2024
7 March 2024
CHRISTINE LINDEY salutes an outstanding exhibition imbued with a sense of national guilt
kitaj 1
Exhibition Review / 22 November 2023
22 November 2023
CHRISTINE LINDEY surveys the cosmopolitan, enigmatic compositions of an idiosyncratic artist whose work speaks of mystery and exile
Similar stories
clark
Book Review / 18 March 2025
18 March 2025
NICK WRIGHT delicately unpicks the eloquent writings on art of an intellectual pessimist who wears his Marxism lightly
locke+van gogh
Culture / 30 December 2024
30 December 2024
From van Gogh to Sonia Boyce, from Hew Locke to Patrick Carpenter and... Pablo Picasso
AIA
Exhibition Review / 7 November 2024
7 November 2024
CHRISTINE LINDEY welcomes a fascinating survey of the work of the communist and socialist artists who founded the AIA in the 1930s
exp web 1
Exhibition review / 28 June 2024
28 June 2024
CHRISTINE LINDEY guides us through the vivid expressionism of a significant but apolitical group of pre WWI artists in Germany