Skip to main content
Baroness Liddell: a bad omen for carbon capture
SOLOMON HUGHES reveals how one of the leading lobbyists for new technology set to hoover up billions in subsidies is already embroiled in a privatisation scandal that has been described as ‘disastrous for taxpayers’
EYE OF A STORM: Baroness Liddell of Coatdyke

ENERGY SECRETARY Ed Miliband guaranteed £21.7 billion in subsidies for carbon capture and storage (CCS) in October. But is it the “clean energy revolution” he promises, or as critics charge, energy firms grabbing subsidies for a questionable technology?

It is a bad sign that one of Britain’s leading CCS lobbyists is simultaneously involved in another scheme widely seen as a corporate taxpayer rip-off. Labour Baroness Helen Liddell is the president of the carbon capture and storage association (CCSA).

She is also a director of Annington Homes, a firm built around a public-sector housing deal described by MPs as “disastrous for taxpayers.” Liddell’s role with Annington is especially shocking because the scandal involves poorly insulated, damp, mouldy houses — the very opposite of what anyone in favour of reducing carbon should countenance.

CCS proposes cutting greenhouse gases by capturing carbon emissions from oil and gas-burning industries and storing them underground in empty old oilfields.

Critics say CCS allows energy firms to continue pumping and burning hydrocarbons, while paying them for the use of their old oil fields for a technology not yet shown to work. Opponents see it as a mix of subsidy-hunting and greenwashing.

The CCSA is Britain’s top CCS lobbyist. The CCSA, funded by the big energy firms, held multiple meetings with the government to design Miliband’s plan to give CCS schemes a £21.7bn subsidy over the next 25 years.

This suggests a £5bn subsidy under Keir Starmer’s current government. Liddell, formerly an energy minister under Tony Blair, is the CCSA’s longstanding president. It’s an unpaid role, but one that keeps her active. Her duties included hosting meetings for newly elected Labour ministers in the House of Lords in July.

Since 2017, Liddell has held one major paid job, chair of Annington Ltd, alongside her CCSA presidency. Annington’s business is one of the most widely criticised privatisation deals of the past 30 years.

In 1996, the then-Tory government sold all military “married quarters” houses to Annington. The Ministry of Defence (MoD) then leased back the 38,000 homes to house military families, a deal the House of Commons public accounts committee described as “disastrous for taxpayers.”

The National Audit Office says the MoD lost up to £4.2bn from the scheme, which leaves soldiers’ families in often grim conditions. The last Tory government finally lost faith in the scheme and launched legal action to take back the houses from Annington. In 2023, the government won their bid to take back the military houses at the High Court, which described the sell-off as a “bad deal.”

In 2017, Annington, which is ultimately controlled by financier Guy Hands and his Terra Firma group, hired Liddell as chairman. She takes a prominent role in resisting the government’s attempts to recover the houses.

The Annington deal is “disastrous” because the MoD sold the houses to the firm but still needs them to house soldiers, sailors, airmen and their families. As a Commons report explained, the houses are “leased back to the MoD by Annington Homes.” However, the “maintenance and upgrading” of these houses “remains the responsibility” of the MoD.

So Annington only has a limited responsibility for looking after the homes it bought from, and now rents back to, the MoD. The result is that Annington makes a huge amount of money from homes that are badly maintained, often leaving military families in grim conditions.

Last year, Labour’s then-shadow defence secretary John Healey commissioned a major report into armed forces accommodation led by Lord Bob Kerslake. The Kerslake Commission reported that service families accommodation — mostly the Annington Homes — was “substandard, and in many cases unacceptable.”

The commission said: “There are long-standing problems in many places with insulation, damp and mould, heating and hot water, as well as with gas and electrical faults and pest infestations.”

The pest infestations and electrical faults are bad enough, but the issues of insulation, dampness and mould are especially striking because they are about poor insulation — when insulation should be one of the main ways of both keeping families in decent conditions and reducing carbon emissions.

In 2022, a BBC investigation brought the issue of the poor quality Annington Homes back into view, under the headline, “Military housing: families say they’re living in damp, mouldy conditions.”

A typical comment from a captain living in “married quarters” — known as service families accommodation — talked about “cupboards unusable due to never-ending damp/mould. Drafty windows. No loft insulation, cold house all the time.”

While the BBC and other media brought the damp, mouldy forces housing back into the spotlight, it did not spark much improvement. The MoD set up a “damp and mould taskforce” and announced new investment to fix double glazing, insulation and boilers in the houses Annington owns.

However, the Kerslake report says that accommodation had “worsened,” with “growing complaints of damp and mould” while “thousands of homes” in service families accommodation “are in need of urgent repair.”

When the government started plans to take them back, Liddell first proposed Annington would spend £105 million to repair the houses — this is an admission of their poor condition — then in 2022, Liddell decided to “withdraw” the offer because the government would not abandon plans to take them back.

Starmer’s government is still trying to get the houses back. Under Liddell, Annington is still resisting, with appeals to the High Court and European Court of Human Rights.

I asked the CCSA if its chair Baroness Liddell’s involvement with one “disaster for taxpayers” suggests CCS may also be another “disaster for taxpayers.” They decided not to comment.

Liddell’s involvement with the Annington “bad deal” for the public, with its poor insulation and grim houses, doesn’t prove that CCS is also a bad deal — but it doesn’t inspire confidence.

Follow Solomon on X @SolHughesWriter.

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
More from this author
TREACHERY FORGOTTEN: John Woodcock, seen here in 2015, betrayed Labour under Corbyn. Now that the right is back in charge, he is welcome to schmooze Labour MPs for Ramsay Healthcare
Features / 23 May 2025
23 May 2025

SOLOMON HUGHES details how the firm has quickly moved on to buttering-up Labour MPs after the fall of the Tories so it can continue to ‘win both ways’ collecting public and private cash by undermining the NHS

Sabrina Carpenter performs during The BRIT Awards 2025 at London's O2 Arena, March 1, 2025
Features / 16 May 2025
16 May 2025

Labour’s pop-loving front bench have snaffled up even more music tickets worth thousands apiece, reports SOLOMON HUGHES

Channel Migrants
Features / 9 May 2025
9 May 2025

Secret consultation documents finally released after the Morning Star’s two-year freedom of information battle show the Home Office misrepresented public opinion, claiming support for policies that most respondents actually strongly criticised as dangerous and unfair, writes SOLOMON HUGHES

Scud_downed_by_Patriot_missiles
Media / 2 May 2025
2 May 2025

SOLOMON HUGHES highlights a 1995 Sunday Times story about the disappearance of ‘defecting Iraqi nuclear scientist.’ Even though the story was debunked, it was widely repeated across the mainstream press, creating the false – and deadly – narrative of Iraqi WMD that eventually led to war

Similar stories
The sign for the Ministry of Defence in London
Britain / 17 December 2024
17 December 2024
SITTING PRETTY: (Left to right) Baroness Liddell, Claire Kob
Features / 29 November 2024
29 November 2024
Let’s take a closer look at the sprawling network of former ministers, political insiders and officials who make money from the firms responsible for soldiers’ squalid accommodation, writes SOLOMON HUGHES
A HEAD SCRATCHER? Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves
Features / 18 October 2024
18 October 2024
Why is Labour so excited about unproven and untested schemes to burn fossil fuels while radically reducing CO₂ emissions? Just follow BP, Drax and Hynet’s money, writes SOLOMON HUGHES
Shadow Energy Secretary Ed Miliband on board the jack-up bar
Features / 10 October 2024
10 October 2024
The government’s reliance on unproven and short-termist technology won’t deliver answers to today’s energy crisis, warns MARK MASLIN