Skip to main content
Work with the NEU
Fixing social security in the aftermath of Covid-19: why the UC £20 uplift is not enough
The Covid-19 pandemic has exposed the flaws and inadequacies of the benefit system and its unacceptably low payment rates, writes ANITA BELLOWS

WHILE ministers have hailed Universal Credit (UC) as a success for not buckling under the unprecedented number of claimants made redundant, to make this work the DWP had to introduce a series of measures stripping UC of some of its core components such as conditionality and injecting more flexibility and generosity into the system.

This implicitly acknowledged that benefits are too low, too complex to claim and are not received in a timely manner: the UC £20 uplift,  suspending the Minimum Income Floor, increasing the Local Housing Allowance Rate, expediting payments etc.

This uplift has been described as a lifeline by claimants, DPOs, charities and other organisations, but while the government is now considering withdrawing it, it has also been shown to be widely insufficient to cover the living costs borne by claimants.

According to the Resolution Foundation, of the more than three million additional claimants since last March, 31 per cent had either taken out new loans or seen their existing debts increase and 61 per cent cent expected to struggle or to fall behind on their bills in the coming three months — around double the national average.

  • On food and food deliveries. 54 per cent of surveyed disabled people said these costs had increased significantly.
     
  • On utilities, as disabled people had to spend more time at home, which has had an impact on their energy consumption. 53 per cent of disabled claimants said these costs had increased significantly and 67 per cent have had to go without essential items at some point during the pandemic.
     
  • On transport, as disabled people were trying to avoid public transport, or sharing cars, they had to rely on taxis to attend essential appointments.
     
  • On healthcare, to compensate for cancelled treatments or absence of treatment and addressing their worsening health as a result.
     
  • On internet costs. Disabled people were more likely to be digitally excluded or non-regular internet users and had to bear additional costs when almost all aspects of daily life moved online with the pandemic.
The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
Similar stories
universal credit
Universal credit / 25 November 2025
25 November 2025

DYLAN MURPHY reports that far from helping people back into work, the sanctions regime is inflicting unnecessary trauma on working-class families

Business Secretary Peter Kyle, Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer on stage ahead of Reeves's keynote speech during the Labour Party Conference at the Liverpool Arena, September 29, 2025
Labour Party Conference 2025 / 30 September 2025
30 September 2025

Labour will find increases in the state pension age are unacceptable, just as cuts to the Winter Fuel Allowance, personal independence payments and universal credit are — it needs to change direction immediately, writes PCS general secretary FRAN HEATHCOTE

A Universal Credit sign on a door of a job centre plus in ea
Features / 12 September 2025
12 September 2025

A new report from the Citizens Advice destroys the government narrative about disabled people ‘choosing’ not to work, showing the £3,000 annual cuts will create a two-tiered system based on claim dates rather than needs, writes DYLAN MURPHY

Art Work is work
TUC Congress 2025 / 9 September 2025
9 September 2025

Artists should not be consigned to a life of precarious working – they deserve dignity and proper workers’ rights, argues ZITA HOLBOURNE