ALEX HALL is disgusted by the misuse of ‘emotional narratives’ to justify uninformed geo-political prejudice
Flawed dialogue on the definition of capitalism
Capitalism: A Conversation in Critical Theory
by Nancy Fraser and Rahel Jaeggi
(Polity, £17.99)
OVERLY abstract and with few historical illustrations of its generalisations, Nancy Fraser and Rahel Jaeggi nevertheless raise points of interest as they debate the definition of capitalism.
Taking a page or so in turn, they accept the basic Marxist assumptions of private ownership of the means of production, a free labour market and capital accumulation premised on the expansion of capital, with the system geared towards making profit instead of satisfying needs.
They see maintenance of the flow of wage labour into the factory for profit-making in production of commodities as dependent on, and subsidised by, unwaged labour in the household — such unpaid labour is necessary for “productive” labour.
More from this author

The latest escalation by the US and Britain in Yemen is a sign of the war spreading out of control, warns JOHN MOORE
Book review: Unveiling the North Korean Economy by Byung-Yeon Kim
Similar stories

Co-curator TOM WHITE introduces a father-and-son exhibition of photography documenting the experience and political engagement of Chilean exiles

LYNNE WALSH applauds a show of paintings that demonstrates the forward strides made by women over four centuries

HENRY BELL steps warily through the collection of a Glaswegian war profiteer to experience his collection of Degas’ remarkable images of working people