Skip to main content
Work with the NEU
Stop the war posturing – Ukraine is a tinderbox
Military brinkmanship is extremely risky – and the Donbass is crawling with neonazis, mercenaries and trigger-happy adventurers. The only sane approach is de-escalation, writes Morning Star editor BEN CHACKO
Ukrainian soldiers examine their tank at a military unit close to Kharkiv, Ukraine

THERE’S an increasingly surreal air to the war scare over Ukraine.

The original roles in the drama seem to be reversed. Back in December Ukrainian Foreign Minister Oleksii Reznikov was warning that “not provoking Russia — that strategy does not and will not work,” claiming that Russia invaded Georgia in 2008 because Nato hadn’t let it join (in fact Georgia began that war by attacking South Ossetia, but these details rarely trouble politicians or journalists).

In December the US seemed much more reluctant to escalate matters. President Joe Biden said it would not deploy troops to Ukraine, and ruled out a military response to any Russian incursion.

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
Similar stories
A Ukrainian flag waves in the centre of the frontline town of Druzhkivka, Donetsk region, Ukraine, August 10, 2026
Eyes Wright / 13 August 2026
13 August 2026

Andy Burnham offers unconditional support for Zelensky but no solutions to the underlying conflict between the Nato/EU bloc and Russia, says NICK WRIGHT

Red Cross volunteers carry an injured woman into an ambulance after a Russian strike in the Lukianivka neighbourhood of Kyiv, Ukraine, May 24, 2026
Editorial / 20 July 2026
20 July 2026
Polish victims of a massacre committed by the Ukrainian Insurgent Army in the village of Lipniki, Wołyń (Volhynia), 1943
History / 14 July 2026
14 July 2026

Poland’s anger over Ukraine’s celebration of the Nazi collaborationist UPA reflects more than historical grievance, says KENNY COYLE

John Healey
Eyes Wright / 17 June 2026
17 June 2026

The defence secretary’s resignation reveals not a split over principle but a dispute over pace of military spending, as Britain’s political Establishment unites behind deeper Nato commitments, argues NICK WRIGHT