Skip to main content
The Morning Star Shop
Starmerism and the Guardian’s sleight of hand
A recent article by Claire Ainsley conceals more than it reveals about current Labour thinking, says SOLOMON HUGHES

IF YOU want an example of how British politics is a sealed system, designed to keep out popular demands for change, a recent article by Claire Ainsley in the Guardian is as good a starting place as any. 

Ainsley was writing as Keir Starmer’s former policy chief, but the fact she is also a corporate lobbyist working for a Tory-run firm was hidden. 

Starmer’s former “brains” was lecturing Labour supporters that Starmer was right to offer little to workers, while working for a firm offering to help corporations with “influencing” the government. 

Once you notice that it makes the dominance of politics by a big club trying to do favours to big business too obvious.

Ainsley’s article said that “Keir Starmer promised he would turn the Labour Party around and give it back to the British people. Three years on from becoming leader, he can credibly claim to have done just that.”  

Starmer had returned Labour to the “centre ground, and it is an “iron law” that you must stay on that centre ground.

The Guardian told its readers: “Claire Ainsley is director of the Progressive Policy Institute’s centre-left renewal project and was Labour’s executive director of policy from 2020 to 2022.” 

Ainsley was Starmer’s policy director when he was elected Labour leader in 2020 until December 2022. To Guardian readers this article might seem to be written by a “progressive” who is sympathetic to Starmer, arguing he is doing the right thing.

But in June Ainsley was hired as a “senior adviser” by WPI Strategy, a lobbying firm. WPI Strategy, founded in 2014, is run by Sean Worth and Nick Faith. 

Worth was David Cameron’s former adviser on NHS privatisation and a one-time head of the Conservative Party policy unit, while Faith founded Tory think tank Onward.

WPI Strategy clients include the Pennon Group, owner of South West Water — which was fined £2 million this April for illegally dumping sewage in the sea — giant commercial landlord British Land and Vodafone.

WPI offers clients help “influencing change” in “regulatory and political environments” using its “highly experienced team drawn from the most senior roles in government.” 

Nick Faith said Ainsley and another new WPI hire, former Lisa Nandy aide Jade Azim, would “advise clients” on “how to prepare for a potential change of government.” The prospect of a Labour government means even Tory lobbyists want Starmer-linked consultants.

Ainsley’s Guardian article relied on some crudely manipulated polling to show Starmer had found the “centre ground.”

Ainsley said: “Overall, voters characterised themselves as 4.6 out of 10 on a scale where 0 was left wing and 10 was right wing. They placed Keir Starmer as 3.9 on the same scale, Sunak on 7.3, and their parties not far behind with Labour on 3.3 and the Conservatives on 7.6.”

For all the “science-y” sounding numbers, this is meaningless. If you poll actual policies, rather than vague concepts, the story is very different. 

Polling shows public ownership of public services is very popular, even with Tory voters — 68 per cent of Tory voters want water in public ownership; and 62 per cent of Tory voters want energy nationalised. Public ownership of the Royal Mail, rail, energy, water and buses has majority support across the board. Yet Starmer has reached the “centre ground” praised by Ainsley by abandoning nationalisation. 

The actual polling Ainsley quoted was carried out by WPI Strategy. As its clients include private water firms, it obviously isn’t going to poll fairly on nationalisation. 

Taxing the rich and corporations to boost the NHS also have broad public support, and so are subjects avoided by WPI.

Ainsley advised Guardian readers that under Labour’s “current plans, there aren’t the tax receipts to redistribute to new or more generous social programmes,” so “the task, then, for the centre left is to advance a new role for government that has the backing of the people and creates the conditions for innovation and prosperity.” The simpler argument — that Labour should increase taxes on the rich and corporations to fund social investment — was mysteriously absent.

Ainsley said: “The new centre-left agenda has to make improving the working and living standards of working-class communities its mission, which requires concrete plans to raise wages, lower costs and increase people’s prospects of a better life for them and their families,” but ruled out any but the vaguest ideas of how to do this. Instead of advising Labour to be tough on corporations, Ainsley told Guardian readers the party should be tough on migrants instead.

However, politics does at least transform some lives — like Claire Ainsley’s. She worked in media and comms for charities, writing some vague policy papers on the way. 

Hired by the Labour leader to develop policy — he had little coherent political thought of his own — Ainsley helped Starmer move away from his “soft left” and pro-EU pledges made in the leadership election, with her emphasis on the need for voters “to be heard” on “concerns about identity [and] immigration.” 

However, Ainsley was herself dumped in December 2022 and took a part-time job for a US think tank pondering “centre-left renewal.”

Then she took what I assume is the well-paid job with WPI. Ainsley advises against politics that can transform working people’s lives, but enjoys the politics that have changed her life.

Many say Ainsley left Starmer’s office because she was not up to the job and that Labour’s lack of policy “offers” during Covid was partly down to her indecision. 

Critics say when Ainsley was asked to develop policy, she often could only refer to focus group discussions rather than draw up solid proposals. 

If WPI wants Ainsley for her contact book rather than her skills, this kind of weakness won’t be a problem.

One of the striking features of Starmer’s leadership is how much it relies on dishonesty — on running for leader on a set of “soft-left” pledges  that were abandoned without any consultation. 

Ainsley hiding her actual role as a lobbyist seems to be another example of this way of working.

Follow Solomon Hughes on X at @SolHughesWriter.

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
More from this author
Prime Minister Keir Starmer speaks during a media conference at the end of the Nato Summit at the Hague, Netherlands, June 25, 2025
Features / 27 June 2025
27 June 2025

SOLOMON HUGHES explains how the PM is channelling the spirit of Reagan and Thatcher with a ‘two-tier’ nuclear deterrent, whose Greenham Common predecessor was eventually fought off by a bunch of ‘punks and crazies’

Palestinians receive donated food at a community kitchen in Gaza City, June 10, 2025
Features / 13 June 2025
13 June 2025

Israel’s combination of starvation, coercion and murder is part of a carefully concerted plan to ensure Palestinian compliance – as shown in leaked details about the sinister Gaza Humanitarian Foundation which reveal similarities to hunger manipulation projects in Vietnam, Malaya and Kenya, says SOLOMON HUGHES

Workers protest outside Google London HQ over the
Lobbying / 6 June 2025
6 June 2025

SOLOMON HUGHES reveals how six MPs enjoyed £400-£600 hospitality at Ditchley Park for Google’s ‘AI parliamentary scheme’ — supposedly to develop ‘effective scrutiny’ of artificial intelligence, but actually funded by the increasingly unsavoury tech giant itself

TREACHERY FORGOTTEN: John Woodcock, seen here in 2015, betrayed Labour under Corbyn. Now that the right is back in charge, he is welcome to schmooze Labour MPs for Ramsay Healthcare
Features / 23 May 2025
23 May 2025

SOLOMON HUGHES details how the firm has quickly moved on to buttering-up Labour MPs after the fall of the Tories so it can continue to ‘win both ways’ collecting public and private cash by undermining the NHS

Similar stories
DON’T BLAME CLAIMANTS: People take part in a protest outsi
Features / 28 March 2025
28 March 2025
Health Secretary Wes Streeting taking £53k from Tory-linked recruiter and outsourcer Peter Hearn’s OPD Group is a great example of how Labour’s rich donors shape policies targeting the poor – not their wealth, writes SOLOMON HUGHES
DODGY DUO: Pleased as Punch Peter Mandelson and Keir Starmer
Features / 7 March 2025
7 March 2025
You’ll never guess why a quick peace in Ukraine might be in the ambassador to Washington’s interests, writes SOLOMON HUGHES. Actually, of course you will – he stands to make a lot of money from his business links to Russia
QUO VADIS? James Lyons He made friends with the Labour right
Features / 24 October 2024
24 October 2024
By hiring a former TikTok PR man as its new head of comms, Labour shows that corporate wheeling and dealing rather than principled politics will be the party’s priority, says SOLOMON HUGHES
DISQUIETING IMPLICATIONS: Labour leader Keir Starmer and the
Features / 30 August 2024
30 August 2024
SOLOMON HUGHES delves into a consultancy that claims it 'grew out of the labour movement'