Skip to main content
Trident catastrophe risk as submariners warn of ageing fleet
The Vanguard-class nuclear deterrent submarine HMS Vengeance at HM Naval Base Clyde, Faslane, September 29, 2017

INCREASINGLY long patrols due to Britain’s ageing fleet of nuclear-armed submarines is ratcheting up the risk of a catastrophic accident, a retired navy commander has warned.

Rob Forsyth captained the nuclear-powered but conventionally armed hunter-killer submarine HMS Sceptre from 1977 to 1979.

He said greater pressure on ageing equipment, coupled with the psychological strain on crew members, could lead to disaster; a rusty HMS Vengeance was spotted returning to port at Faslane at the weekend after 201 days on patrol.

Tours on the previous generation of nuclear-armed subs rarely exceeded 60-70 days, but in the past few years stays on the Vanguard fleet have regularly exceeded 150 days, with two patrols having been in excess of 200 days.

Commander Forsyth, who retired from the Royal Navy in 1980 to pursue a career in industry and now campaigns against Trident, said Britain is approaching the stage of having to ask whether it is possible to maintain a continuous deterrent.

He said both boats and people are being put at risk as a new generation of submarines is not expected to become operational until at least the early 2030s.

“All the boats are past their design life now, which means they are more liable to technical failure,” Comm Forsyth told the Sunday Post.

“I was at sea in Polaris boats and we used to reckon three months was the longest for keeping your sanity.

“My generation find the concept of six months almost unbelievable. It must be having an effect on at least some of the people.

“I believe there will be some form of lasting mental damage.”

Patrols often mean working without days off, showering for 20 seconds every two days and communication from home coming via a 120-word correspondence received once a week.

CND general secretary Kate Hudson said: “We’ve entered a dangerous new normal where increasingly shaky subs and their crews are enduring patrols in excess of six months. This should be a matter of concern for us all.

“Time must be called on this crumbling and wasteful project that puts us all at risk. With an election looming, we call on supporters to make scrapping nuclear weapons and using the money to rebuild our public services an issue on the doorstep.” 

The Royal Navy said: “While we do not comment on patrol lengths, we take safety very seriously, and all submarines go through rigorous safety checks before any patrol.”

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
More from this author
PCS conference
PCS conference / 21 May 2025
21 May 2025
starmer
Gaza / 21 May 2025
21 May 2025

Civil servants slam Starmer over continued support for Israel

mobiles
PCS conference / 21 May 2025
21 May 2025

Civil servants fear for their jobs following pledges to expand AI use

(From left) Sarah Morton, Fran Heathcote, Martin Cavanagh, Angela Grant, Andy Mitchell
PCS Conference 2025 / 20 May 2025
20 May 2025
Similar stories
SABLE RATTLING:  Keir Starmer visits to a military base in s
Features / 22 March 2025
22 March 2025
SOPHIE BOLT explains why Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament is organising a national protest tour at nuclear bases, starting with a demo at BAE shipyard in Barrow, where Starmer and Healey have been banging the drum for war
Britain / 3 February 2025
3 February 2025
AT THE READY: Crew members from the US Coast Guard Cutter Jo
Features / 3 August 2024
3 August 2024
In the second of his three-part series on how the new Labour government’s foreign policy is likely to shape up, KENNY COYLE examines David Lammy’s writings on Asia and the Indo-Pacific region – where the risk of military flashpoints is high