ON JULY 28, the 70th birthday of Hugo Chavez (1954-2013), Nicolas Maduro Moros won the Venezuelan presidential election, the fifth since the Bolivarian constitution was ratified in 1999.

In January 2025, Maduro will start his third six-year term as president. He took over the reins of the Bolivarian revolution after the death of Chavez from pelvic cancer in 2013.

Since the death of Chavez, Maduro has faced several challenges: to build his own legitimacy as president in the place of a charismatic man who came to define the Bolivarian revolution; to tackle the collapse of oil prices in mid-2014, which negatively affected Venezuela’s state revenues (over 90 per cent of which were from oil exports); and to manage a response to the unilateral, illegal sanctions deepened on Venezuela by the United States as oil prices declined.

These negative factors weighed heavily on the Maduro government, which has now been in office for a decade after being re-elected through the ballot box in 2018 and now in 2024.

From Maduro’s first election victory in 2013, the increasingly far-right opposition began to reject the electoral process and complain about irregularities in the system. Interviews I have held over the past decade with conservative politicians have made it clear that they recognise both the ideological grip of Chavismo over the working class of Venezuela and the organisational power not only of Maduro’s United Socialist Party of Venezuela but of the networks of Chavismo that run from the communes (1.4 million strong) to youth organisations.

About half of Venezuela’s voting population is reliably wedded to the Bolivarian project, and no other political project in Venezuela has the kind of election machine built by the forces of the Bolivarian revolution.

That makes winning an election for the anti-Chavez forces impossible. To that end, their only path is to malign Maduro’s government as corrupt and to complain that the elections are not fair. After Maduro’s victory — by a margin of 51.2 per cent to 44.2 per cent — this is precisely what the far-right opposition has been trying to do, egged on by the United States and a network of far-right and pro-US governments in South America.

Europe needs Venezuelan oil

The United States has been trying to find a solution to a problem of its own making. Having placed severe sanctions against both Iran and Russia, the United States now cannot easily find a source of energy for its European partners.

Liquefied natural gas from the United States is expensive and not sufficient. What the US would like is to have a reliable source of oil that is easy to process and in sufficient quantities. Venezuelan oil fits the requirements, but given the US sanctions on Venezuela, this oil cannot be found in the European market. The United States has created a trap from which it finds few solutions. 

In June 2022, the US government allowed Eni SpA (Italy) and Repsol SA (Spain) to transport Venezuelan oil to the European market to compensate for the loss of Russian oil deliveries. This allowance revealed Washington’s shift in strategy regarding Venezuela. No longer was it going to be possible to suffocate Venezuela by preventing exports of oil, since this oil was needed as a result of US sanctions on Russia. Since June 2022, the United States has been trying to calibrate its need for this oil, its antipathy to the Bolivarian revolution, and its relations with the far-right opposition in Venezuela.

The US and the Venezuelan far right

The emergence of Chavismo — the politics of mass action to build socialism in Venezuela — transformed the political scenario in the country. The old parties of the right (Accion Democratica and COPEI) collapsed after 40 years of alternating power.

In the 2000 and 2006 elections, the opposition to Chavez was provided not by the right, but by dissenting centre-left forces (La Causa R and Un Nuevo Tiempo). The old right faced a challenge from the new right, which was decidedly pro-capitalist, anti-Chavista, and pro-US; this group formed a political platform called La Salida or The Exit, which referred to their desired exit from the Bolivarian revolution.

The key figures here were Leopoldo Lopez, Antonio Ledezma and Maria Corina Machado, who led violent protests against the government in 2014 (Lopez was arrested for incitement to violence and now lives in Spain; a US government official in 2009 said he is “often described as arrogant, vindictive and power-hungry.”)

Ledezma moved to Spain in 2017 and was — with Corina Machado— a signatory of the far-right Madrid Charter, an anti-communist manifesto organised by the Spanish far-right party, Vox. Corina Machado’s political project is underpinned by the proposal to privatise Venezuela’s oil company.

Since the death of Chavez, Venezuela’s right wing has struggled with the absence of a unified programme and with a mess of egotistical leaders. It fell to the United States to try and shape the opposition into a political project.

The most comical attempt was the elevation in January 2019 of an obscure politician named Juan Guaido to be the president. That manoeuvre failed and in December 2022, the far-right opposition removed Guaido as its leader. The removal of Guaido allowed for direct negotiations between the Venezuelan government and the far-right opposition, which had since 2019 hoped for US military intervention to secure them in power in Caracas.

The US pressured the increasingly intransigent far right to hold talks with the Venezuelan government in order to allow the US to reduce sanctions and let Venezuelan oil go into European markets.

This pressure resulted in the Barbados Agreement of October 2023, in which the two sides agreed to a fair election in 2024 as the basis for the slow withdrawal of the sanctions. The elections of July 28 are the outcome of the Barbados process. Even though Maria Corina Machado was barred from running, she effectively ran against Maduro through her proxy candidate Edmundo Gonzalez and lost in a hard-fought election.

Twenty-three minutes after the polls closed, US Vice-President Kamala Harris — and now a presidential candidate in the November elections in the United States — put out a tweet conceding that the far right had lost. It was an early sign that the United States, despite making noises about election fraud, wanted to move past its allies in the far right, find a way to normalise relations with the Venezuelan government and allow the oil to flow to Europe.

This tendency of the US government has frustrated the far right, which turned to other far-right forces across Latin America for support, and which knows that its remaining political argument is about election fraud.

If the US government wants to get Venezuelan oil to Europe it will need to abandon the far right and accommodate the Maduro government. Meanwhile, the far right has taken to the streets through armed gangs who want to repeat the guarimba (barricade) disruptions of 2017.

Vijay Prashad is an Indian historian, editor, and journalist. He is a writing fellow and chief correspondent at Globetrotter. He is an editor of LeftWord Books and the director of Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research. He has written more than 20 books, including The Darker Nations and The Poorer Nations. His latest books are Struggle Makes Us Human: Learning from Movements for Socialism and (with Noam Chomsky) The Withdrawal: Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan and the Fragility of US Power.

This article was produced by Globetrotter.