Skip to main content
Gifts from The Morning Star
Their ‘mobs’ and our protests: knowing the difference
EP Thompson opposed romanticising riots, but the democratic intent of Palestinian protests is evident – which is why the powers that be really hate them. Looking at history, from the Chartists to today, they always have, explains KEITH FLETT
A young protester is pounced on by police officers on Whitehall, December 2023

THE right-wing media is full of bellicose Tories, including the Prime Minister, who say that Palestinian protests are “aggressive mobs” that are apparently threatening democracy. Yet more measures are planned to “crack down” on protest, except for ones that the Tories support such as farmers, of course.

Before she was sacked as home secretary, Suella Braverman said Palestinian protests were “hate marches” and protesters an “intimidating mob,” which is also what the reactionary thinker Edmund Burke said about the French revolution.

She then summoned up far-right groups who duly appeared and attacked police at the Cenotaph on Armistice Day. Meanwhile, crowds of many hundreds of thousands have continued to march peacefully calling for a ceasefire in Gaza in central London.

Historically speaking — not a phrase likely to be found on the lips of Braverman or Sunak — one person’s mob is another person’s crowd.

For example, protesting outside the house of someone who has transgressed many people’s understanding of what might be termed a “moral economy” is a British tradition stretching back over many centuries.

It was not, however, by any means always politically progressive, so the controversy over it is also something not recent. An anti-war crowd was to be found protesting outside President Joe Biden’s private house recently, reflecting deep tensions being caused by Gaza in the US.

As the great historian of 19th century protest, George Rude, underlined what reactionaries thought was a mob was in many cases simply a peaceful crowd making reasonable points. If one wants to look for a mob, the activities of the Bullingdon Club are a good place to start.

While Rude saw in protests, up to and including riots, the work of the crowd, with broadly progressive intentions and outcomes, EP Thompson was less happy with this formulation. He suggested that riots could also contain reactionary elements and the crowd involved in the Gordon Riots in 1780 would be an obvious example.

Thompson’s work on food riots points to the reality that the threat of a protest was often more effective than an actual riot. It could cause a reduction in the price of bread or the distribution of hoarded food. When riots did, quite rarely, occur, very much the same impact was to be found. Hidden food was seized and distributed at low prices.

There were other, more obviously political riots, often associated with the Chartists in the 1840s. The Chartists were an organised political force that most certainly did not support riots. It was rather the wider Chartist crowd that participated in such activities, often after provocation from the authorities.

There has been a lot more research and wider perspectives on the crowd since Thompson and Rude looked at the matter in the 1960s and ’70s. Crowds are viewed from the perspective of safety, risk management and psychology as well as history.

Historical research, however, can provide useful context by looking at who the individuals involved in mob or crowd protests were, what their intention was, how this turned out and what the reaction of authority was.

Such research is limited because often the only people who can be identified are those who are arrested and any who make public statements about their activities.

The democratic crowd will usually make it clear what it’s about so a lack of clarity may suggest a mob with less clear intent. The Palestinian protests in London and around Britain have made it perfectly obvious what they are about, even if Braverman, Sunak and co don’t like it. That’s democratic politics — something else Braverman and other Tories don’t like.

Keith Flett is a socialist historian. Follow him on X @kmflett.

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
More from this author
Prime Minister Tony Blair welcomes American President George W Bush to the first meeting of the G8 Summit at the Gleneagles Hotel in Scotland, July 7, 2005
Features / 26 June 2025
26 June 2025

While Hardie, MacDonald and Wilson faced down war pressure from their own Establishment, today’s leadership appears to have forgotten that opposing imperial adventures has historically defined Labour’s moral authority, writes KEITH FLETT

Former Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn speaking at the People's Assembly Against Austerity protest in central London, June 7, 2025
Labour’s loss / 12 June 2025
12 June 2025

10 years ago this month, Corbyn saved Labour from its right-wing problem, and then the party machine turned on him. But all is not lost yet for the left, says KEITH FLETT

WINNING OVER THE WORKING CLASS? Margaret Thatcher (left) personally sells off a London council house in her bid to undermine the welfare state and woo Labour voters via the 1980 Housing Act and so-called ‘right to buy’ for tenants
Features / 26 May 2025
26 May 2025

Research shows Farage mainly gets rebel voters from the Tory base and Labour loses voters to the Greens and Lib Dems — but this doesn’t mean the danger from the right isn’t real, explains historian KEITH FLETT

Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch at their local election campaign launch at The Curzon Centre in Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire, March 20, 2025
Features / 14 May 2025
14 May 2025

KEITH FLETT traces how the ‘world’s most successful political party’ has imploded since Thatcher’s fall, from nine leaders in 30 years to losing all 16 English councils, with Reform UK symbolically capturing Peel’s birthplace, Tamworth — but the beast is not dead yet

Similar stories
A cartoon depiction of the arrest of the Cato Street Conspir
Features / 4 February 2025
4 February 2025
The legacy of an 1820 conspiracy in revenge for Peterloo resonates down the ages, argues KEITH FLETT

A statue of former British prime minister Sir Robert Peel i
Features / 17 September 2024
17 September 2024
KEITH FLETT draws parallels with the 1834 Tory crisis, noting the absence of modern-day Robert Peel among the leadership contenders capable of reinventing the party for a new era
REACTIONARY RAMPAGE:
The house of radical dissenter
Joseph P
Features / 19 August 2024
19 August 2024
Socialist historian KEITH FLETT traces the parallel evolution of violent loyalist rampages and the workers' movement's peaceful democratic crowds, highlighting the stark contrast between recent far-right thuggery and mass Gaza protests
A sketch of the Drax Hall plantation in Barbados
Tolpuddle Martyrs Festival 2024 / 20 July 2024
20 July 2024
KEITH FLETT uncovers the links between Dorset landowners, Caribbean plantations, slavery and the prosecution of trade unionists, revealing a darker side to the Tolpuddle Martyrs’ story