Skip to main content
Donate to the 95 years appeal
Swinney bomb stance ‘confused and confusing,’ say campaigners
An undated photo provided by the Ministry of Defence of vanguard class nuclear submarine HMS Vengeance in Gare Loch, after departing HM Naval Base Clyde in Faslane, Scotland

SCOTTISH First Minister John Swinney’s backing for Nato and higher defence spending even as he renews his party’s opposition to nuclear bombs has been slammed as “confused and confusing” by peace campaigners.

Mr Swinney, who campaigned for Scottish independence under the “Bairns not Bombs” banner, was fulsome in his support for Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s plans to “reshape the economy” by boosting arms spending to 2.5 per cent of GDP, but took issue with its funding model.

He branded Labour plans to cut international aid spending the “wrong choice,” but said: “I do think it’s necessary to take seriously the threat of security, which therefore leads to the conclusion that we need to spend more on defence.”

Mr Swinney, whose SNP party backs an independent Scotland joining Nato and its first-strike nuclear alliance, added: “There are obviously choices to be made, the United Kingdom is spending billions of pounds every year servicing the Trident nuclear missile system.

“As a party, as a government, as an individual, I wouldn’t support the possession of nuclear weapons.

“There’s obviously resources that could have been spent alternatively on defence than on Trident missiles, which are not stopping conflict in the world today and they’re not able to be deployed in the current challenges we face.”

Despite reiterating his opposition to nuclear weapons, he appeared to blame Ukraine’s 1994 decision to give up a stockpile on its territory, inherited from the Soviet Union, to Russia as a factor in why it was invaded.

“Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons — it’s not had all the security guarantees that I think are necessary in the world today,” he said.

“To me, that’s the answer to the point — it’s to have the necessary security guarantees that will protect a country like Ukraine.”

Branding the SNP leader’s position “confused and confusing,” Stop the War Scotland student officer Coll McCail told the Star: “We’ve come a long way from ‘Bairns not Bombs.’

“On Tuesday the SNP backed a hike in defence spending at Westminster.

“On Wednesday, they voted against ending state subsidy to the arms industry at Holyrood.

“Today, John Swinney appears to suggest nuclear weapons, in some form, are necessary for global security.”

Mr McCail said 2025 is the ninth year of record global military spending, adding: “A brief look around the world today makes crystal clear that a renewed arms race is the last thing we need.

Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
More from this author
(left to right) Scottish Labour deputy leader Jackie Baillie, Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar and Davy Russell celebrate during a rally on Castle Street, Hamilton, after he was declared the winner for the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election, June 6, 2025
Scotland / 6 June 2025
6 June 2025
Teachers from the Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS) union take part in a rally outside the constituency office of Education Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville in Dunfermline, Fife, during their strike action in dispute over pay, February 22, 2023
EIS Conference 2025 / 6 June 2025
6 June 2025
Teachers from the Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS) union take part in a rally outside the Tramway in Glasgow on day two of the strike action in a dispute over pay, March 1, 2023
Scotland / 6 June 2025
6 June 2025
Similar stories
The complete destruction brought about by the atomic bomb on
Hiroshima Day 2024 / 6 August 2024
6 August 2024
As tensions rise in Ukraine and Gaza, KATE HUDSON argues that Western militarisation and Nato expansion bring us closer to nuclear catastrophe — we must heed the lessons of history
WAR VS PEACE: Nuclear submarines on the Clyde in Faslane
Features / 29 June 2024
29 June 2024
Before voting we'll be well advised to look at the various political parties' stance with regard to nuclear weapons, suggests ARTHUR WEST