PEERS inflicted their first defeat against PM Rishi Sunak’s proposed Rwanda asylum law today — putting the House of Lords on a collision course with the government.
The upper chamber backed by 274 votes to 172, majority 102, a move to ensure the draft legislation, aimed at clearing the way to send asylum-seekers who cross the Channel in small boats on a one-way flight to Kigali, is fully compliant with the law.
The heavy government defeat sets the stage for an extended tussle between the Commons and Lords during “ping-pong,” where legislation is batted between the two houses until agreement is reached.
Nicola David, founder of One Life to Live, added: “This Bill is indescribably bonkers: it should never have seen the light of day.
“Rwanda has a history of shooting and killing refugees — how can we possibly declare it to be safe?”
Refugee charity Care4Calais CEO Steve Smith said: “The tragic loss of a seven-year-old girl over the weekend, coming days after the loss of another three refugees in the English Channel last week, is a sharp reminder that the government’s hostile environment costs lives.
“The Rwanda plan will do nothing to stop Channel crossings. All it is doing is inflicting more trauma and misery on people who have already survived horrors such as war, torture and persecution. The Supreme Court was clear, Rwanda is not a safe country to send refugees to, and the Lords should respect the Supreme Court’s judgement and reject the government’s brutal policy.”