Skip to main content
New report reveals deeply-entrenched influence of arms industry on government policies
Trade unionists and protesters form a blockade outside weapons manufacturer BAE Systems in Rochester, Kent, in protest over the Israel-Gaza conflict and calling for an immediate ceasefire to halt the killing of civilians in Palestine, November 10, 2023

ARMS companies are perverting British government policy through unprecedented influence on ministers and officials, a new report has revealed.

The result is arms export decisions which sustain war crimes, human rights abuses and blatant corruption, with rules are regularly bent in favour of the industry, it claims.

Over 10 years, ministers and top civil servants met with arms executives an average of 1.64 times every day, shows the report by Campaign Against the Arms Trade (CAAT) and the World Peace Foundation.

The report also said that over 40 per cent of high-ranking military officers and Ministry of Defence officials took jobs in the arms and security industries upon leaving the public service.

And the leading arms monopoly, BAE Systems, had more meetings with the Prime Minister and other ministers than any other company.

BAE has been at the centre of bribery and corruption scandals relating to arms sales on several occasions, and the report claims that it has effectively become a “privately owned branch of the state.”

Two other arms companies, Airbus and Rolls-Royce, also enjoyed very high levels of access.

The report argues that the movement of people between government and the industry is no longer a “revolving door” but an “open-plan office” within the national security establishment.

The report’s author, CAAT research co-ordinator Sam Perlo-Freeman, said: “This is a broken system. No industry should have this level of influence over government, especially one that deals in death and destruction.

“This level of influence is profoundly undemocratic and means that shareholder profits are protected at all costs — even if this means complicity in appalling war crimes.

“Radical measures are urgently needed to break the arms industry’s stranglehold on government policy.”

The report argues that the intimacy between the government and the arms industry has been a deliberate government policy over many years.

And it is sustained despite regular cost over-runs and other malpractice in delivering military equipment contracts.

Consequences identified in the report include a weak arms export control regime which has allowed the industry to continue supplying weapons for atrocities in Yemen, Palestine and elsewhere; virtual immunity from corruption charges; and sustained high profits for the companies concerned.

The report argues that persistent procurement problems will not be fixed unless the overly cosy relationship between the government and the main suppliers is addressed.

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
More from this author
An anti-nuclear protester takes part in a demonstration, organised by Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND), at the headquarters of the Atomic Weapons Establishment in Aldermaston, Berkshire, April 2013
Peace Movement / 30 May 2025
30 May 2025
ouse of Commons Handout photo issued by the House of Commons of Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch during Prime Minister's Questions in the House of Commons, London, May 21, 2025
Eyes Left / 28 May 2025
28 May 2025

The Tories’ trouble is rooted in the British capitalist Establishment now being more disoriented and uncertain of its social mission than before, argues ANDREW MURRAY

Similar stories
Defence Secretary John Healey leaves 10 Downing Street, Lond
Britain / 2 December 2024
2 December 2024
Campaigners blockade BAE Systems’ Glascoed site
Britain / 27 November 2024
27 November 2024
SUNS OUT, GUNS OUT: The Royal International Air Tattoo is an
Features / 21 June 2024
21 June 2024
Foreign Office documents reveal ministers’ cosy relationship with weapons manufacturers, as they eagerly seek industry input on a confrontational strategy in the Indo-Pacific region, reports SOLOMON HUGHES