Skip to main content
Advertise Buy the paper Contact us Shop Subscribe Support us
How we dodged the mushroom cloud in 2024
MATTHEW ALFORD considers the principal four reasons there wasn’t a nuclear exchange this year, despite the Ukraine war, the carnage in the Middle East, the provocations over Taiwan — and his best predictions

I MADE a bet in January this year that I’d clean my horrible stairs if humanity didn’t nuke itself by New Year’s 2025, and throughout the year, I remained pretty confident I’d never have to deliver. But it looks like I’m breaking out Henry Hoover.
 
How did it all go so wrong for my never-cleaning plan? In a year of catastrophic violence on the borders of Russia and across the Middle East, how have we escaped the terminus that is the mushroom cloud? There are four main reasons.
 
Firstly, the relative restraint of Iran, Russia and China. We can quibble about Russia, which has been the most aggressive of the three. For sure, Iran, though, has had casus belli to hit Israel fatally but has opted instead for demonstration strikes.

China, for its part, has not been drawn into a much-anticipated fight on the Taiwan Straits or in the South China Sea. These are perhaps the most serious flashpoints in the world — because if China did mobilise, the US wouldn’t be able to do much except slink away or threaten to use nukes.
 
Second: no stupid accidents. Battlefield mistakes happen with alarming frequency, and we’re due one any day. Memorably, due to a silly mix-up, Russia nearly blew up 30 RAF personnel in 2022. They would have done so had the airman’s missile not miraculously jammed in its bay. If such a fatality occurs, we will be lethally engaged with Russia.
 
Third: Donald Trump won the election. Many of Trump’s colleagues are hawks, but he has an instinct for moderation in foreign policy. It’s hard to know how important Trump himself has been to our survival these past few weeks, but his presence may have been crucial.

For instance, on December 11, Ukraine fired six US Atacms against an airbase outside the Russian city of Taganrog. Russian authorities immediately signalled that they were preparing to respond with several Oreshnik missiles — Moscow’s lightning-speed new missile system that can carry a nuclear payload.

Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
More from this author
Opinion / 17 October 2024
17 October 2024
MATTHEW ALFORD questions the establishment-pleasing politics that underlie so-called ‘political satire’
Features / 21 December 2023
21 December 2023
No matter how black our satire, the government goes blacker – as shown in the WikiLeaks founders’ case, says MATTHEW ALFORD
Features / 9 May 2023
9 May 2023
MATTHEW ALFORD asks how innocent the arts and the celebrities who front them up really are
Features / 20 March 2022
20 March 2022
As a civilisation we are in thrall to and infantilised by our own righteousness, while ignoring the corporate interests that make war miserably predictable, writes MATTHEW ALFORD
Similar stories
Features / 4 December 2024
4 December 2024
The use of long-range weapons marks a terrifying escalation as Biden and Starmer ignore the growing calls for peace from ordinary Ukrainians and Russians in favour of more carnage, writes SOPHIE BOLT
Opinion / 17 October 2024
17 October 2024
MATTHEW ALFORD questions the establishment-pleasing politics that underlie so-called ‘political satire’
Features / 12 October 2024
12 October 2024
Emotional appeals for assisted suicide overlook crucial policy implications and safeguarding issues, writes KEVIN YUILL, looking at the worrying data from the countries where it is already legal
Features / 24 February 2024
24 February 2024
The US and Britain's refusal of the Russia-Ukraine neutrality deal in March 2022 led to a brutal war with more than 500,000 casualties — a direct war with the West risks even more carnage, warn MEDEA BENJAMIN and NICOLAS JS DAVIES