Skip to main content
Fake news from Israel
In times of war, the press should consider whether the most sensational stories are true before publishing. Of course, it doesn’t — and there’s no penalty when they turn out to be nonsense, laments SOLOMON HUGHES
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

IN 1990, Saddam Hussein’s Iraq invaded its neighbour Kuwait. The war was a quick victory, with fatalities on both sides in the hundreds. However, Iraq’s occupation of Kuwait was grim: resisting Kuwaitis were imprisoned and tortured. Up to 600 Kuwaiti prisoners were killed by the Iraqi occupiers.

But the news was dominated by one story that turned out to be untrue. From 1990 on, many newspapers reported invading Iraqi troops had looted Kuwait’s hospitals; the invaders supposedly took away incubators, leaving between 90 and 300 premature babies to die on the floor.

This terrible crime was reported in every top newspaper, was the subject of hearings in US congress and was referred to by many politicians. Those who raised doubts about the story were attacked by newspapers like the Telegraph.

But the incubator story was untrue. The doubters were proved right after the US led invasion kicked Iraq out in the first Gulf war. It was a propaganda tale promoted by Kuwaitis and picked up uncritically by newspapers and even — to their great embarrassment — Amnesty International.

Hussein was evicted from Kuwait but remained the ruler of Iraq until 2003. He was a despot, who imprisoned, tortured and murdered many dissidents. When the US decided to invade Iraq in the wake of the September 11 attack, one extra-grim story about his torture appeared.

Iraqi exiles in favour of the upcoming invasion circulated a story that Saddam bought an industrial plastic shredder and was feeding prisoners feet-first into the device. The story was picked up by pro-war campaigners.

A headline for a Times story by Labour MP Ann Clwyd promoting an invasion of Iraq on the back of the story read “See men shredded then say you don’t back war.” But while Saddam’s torture and killing were real, there was no evidence for the plastic shredder tale.

Why are these gory but fake stories added to true tales of torture and abuse? Put simply, they are promoted because government spokespeople don’t think that the true story of killings, however bad, is enough to get people to back war, which will inevitably lead to more killings.

The propaganda tales have a visceral quality, an air of savagery, that is designed to appeal to our emotions, and overwhelm people’s judgement: they are promoted to overcome people’s calculation that one set of killings isn’t going to be made better with a much greater wave of killing.

They are used to short-circuit judgement and overcome argument — who wants to be found arguing that these particularly gory acts should be tolerated in any way, even if the result is greater destruction?

Israeli officials seem to have studied the playbook for the Gulf war and Iraq invasion because they are repeating the pattern of propaganda.

Saddam really did torture and kill Kuwaitis and Iraqis, but didn’t evict babies from incubators or kill people with plastic shredders. By the same token, Hamas fighters really did raid Israel and kill around 1,200 people — including many civilians, women and children — in a murderous assault. But Israeli officials have added their own visceral, but untrue tales.

Famously, Israeli ministers and diplomats regularly claimed that Hamas “beheaded 40 babies,” and newspapers duly repeated some variant of this story as a fact — sometimes the babies were “beheaded,” sometimes, as with the Times, it was “40 babies having their throats cut.”

Simple maths showed this story was not true: Hamas fighters did indeed kill around 40 children — mostly of primary and secondary school age. One, or possibly two babies were also killed. But there were not 40 mothers missing their babies, so Hamas could not “behead 40” of them.

Forty children killed is a terrible toll by itself, so why would anyone inflate the story in this gory manner? Because very few people would be convinced that the correct answer to Hamas fighters killing 40 Israeli kids is IDF bombs killing 4,000 Palestinian kids. The point of the shocking “beheading” tale is to overcome the brutal maths of war.  

Simple numbers should have meant the newspapers could see the tale was untrue from the start. Instead, it has taken brave reporting from Israel’s Haaretz newspaper to show that the story was false. Haaretz also showed other gory stories of Hamas atrocities — like a pregnant woman being killed and her baby cut from her womb, or a baby being killed in an oven — were also fake.

There is a real, and terrible story about the Hamas raid, so why embroider it with these gory tales? Sometimes their origin is in the garbled responses of genuinely shocked “first responders” including non-professional charity workers who went to the scene of the Hamas massacres.

But these have been picked up and passed on by Israeli embassies, ministers and officials. They know that they are having trouble justifying the huge death toll in Gaza, so hope these sensationalist stories will grab headlines and emotions.

The stories are being used to either try to win an unwinnable argument, or just fill the political space with disgust and despair so people are put off thinking about the issue at all.

You might hope that newspaper and broadcast journalists might remember the propaganda from the Gulf war or the Iraq invasion, or the many historic examples before that. Veteran journalist Philip Knightley wrote a whole book about it, The First Casualty: The War Correspondent as Hero and Myth-Maker from the Crimea to Iraq, which every journalist should read.

When a story sounds like a Hollywood horror film — or in the case of “secret underground bases under hospitals,” like a James Bond movie — it doesn’t mean it is made up. Horrible and bizarre things can be true. But wartime tales that have these melodramatic qualities do need to be examined for evidence.

Unfortunately, that’s not how much of the media works. No journalists were penalised for promoting previous propaganda tales, while those who tried to debunk them were not always celebrated. For all the media’s obsession with the danger of “fake news,” there isn’t always a strong incentive to uncover it.

Follow Solomon Hughes on X at @SolHughesWriter.

Morning Star Conference - Race, Sex & Class
Support the Morning Star
You can read five articles for free every month,
but please consider supporting us by becoming a subscriber.
More from this author
TREACHERY FORGOTTEN: John Woodcock, seen here in 2015, betrayed Labour under Corbyn. Now that the right is back in charge, he is welcome to schmooze Labour MPs for Ramsay Healthcare
Features / 23 May 2025
23 May 2025

SOLOMON HUGHES details how the firm has quickly moved on to buttering-up Labour MPs after the fall of the Tories so it can continue to ‘win both ways’ collecting public and private cash by undermining the NHS

Sabrina Carpenter performs during The BRIT Awards 2025 at London's O2 Arena, March 1, 2025
Features / 16 May 2025
16 May 2025

Labour’s pop-loving front bench have snaffled up even more music tickets worth thousands apiece, reports SOLOMON HUGHES

Channel Migrants
Features / 9 May 2025
9 May 2025

Secret consultation documents finally released after the Morning Star’s two-year freedom of information battle show the Home Office misrepresented public opinion, claiming support for policies that most respondents actually strongly criticised as dangerous and unfair, writes SOLOMON HUGHES

Scud_downed_by_Patriot_missiles
Media / 2 May 2025
2 May 2025

SOLOMON HUGHES highlights a 1995 Sunday Times story about the disappearance of ‘defecting Iraqi nuclear scientist.’ Even though the story was debunked, it was widely repeated across the mainstream press, creating the false – and deadly – narrative of Iraqi WMD that eventually led to war

Similar stories
A civilian casualty of war in Iraq lost both legs
Books / 14 April 2025
14 April 2025
A uncomfortably misogynistic authorial voice that sometimes seems to lack insight troubles FIONA O’CONNOR
Features / 30 December 2024
30 December 2024
Britain’s state broadcaster is facing major internal discontent about its reporting on the Israel-Gaza conflict. Journalists are claiming it is systematically biased and frames events in a misleading way, writes MARC VANDEPITTE
Displaced Palestinians inspect their tents destroyed by Isra
Features / 7 October 2024
7 October 2024
One year on from October 7 2023, the general secretary of the International Federation of Journalists, ANTHONY BELLANGER, deplores the paralysis of the UN and denounces the international community’s lack of action
A Palestinian carries his belongings as he evacuates Maghazi
27 August 2024
27 August 2024