The 25th anniversary meeting of the Shanghai Co-operation Organisation in the Kyrgyz capital may offer a glimmer of hope that international relations do not need to be defined by endless confrontation, writes KENNY COYLE
HOW a government funds its expenditure is a question that all countries face. It is not confined to capitalist economies. It applies to Cuba as well as to Britain and the US.
Government expenditure invariably exceeds its income whether by design as a result of investment decisions, or due to natural disasters or war. Governments with a sovereign currency (and Britain is such a country, unlike those who are inside the EU) can simply print money to fund expenditure. However, that will lead to inflationary pressures on prices, at least in the short term, as general demand for resources increases.
Traditionally, governments have borrowed money from the private financial market through the issuance of bonds. Money is thus taken away from private finance into the hands of the government to spend.
The question is not simply how much we spend on defence, but what we understand defence and security to mean, says SIMON BRIGNELL
Only an ambitious programme of state-led investment can restore growth and improve living standards, argues MICHAEL BURKE
Years of underfunding are eroding Scotland’s local services and deepening inequality in communities, says VINCE MILLS
If the government really wanted to address public finances, improve living standards and begin economic recovery, it would increase its borrowing for investment, argues MICHAEL BURKE



