Skip to main content
Advertise Buy the paper Contact us Shop Subscribe Support us
The double standards of the West are on full display at the ICJ
SEVIM DAGDELEN writes that the response of Germany to Nicaragua’s charges of aiding and abetting genocide in Gaza has been to downplay its role in supplying arms and question the premise that genocide is already taking place

THE German government’s appearance before the International Court of Justice in the proceedings for aiding and abetting genocide and violations of international humanitarian law in Gaza is a lesson in Western double standards. On April 8 and 9, Germany sat in the dock in The Hague after Nicaragua filed a case at the highest UN judicial body.
 
The 43-page document accuses Germany of failing to fulfil its obligations under the Genocide Convention to prevent genocide. Essentially, Germany is accused of aiding and abetting genocide and violating international humanitarian law with its political, financial, and military support for Israel as well as by ceasing to fund the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA). In view of the urgency of the situation, Nicaragua requested five interim measures to prevent the facilitation of genocide. These include the demand that Germany stop supplying arms to Israel and resume payments to UNRWA to ensure sufficient humanitarian aid for the Palestinian population.

Does arming a state committing genocide make you an accomplice?
 
The arguments put forward by the German government in its defence were unconvincing. With a flood of Powerpoint slides, the German representation initially tried to play down the significance of Germany’s arms deliveries to Israel.

It argued that the majority of the arms export licences issued after October 7 were for so-called “other military equipment” (“sonstige Rustungsguter”) and only a relatively small proportion for so-called “weapons of war” (“Kriegswaffen”). This was an attempt to deceive the court and the public.

What the German defence failed to mention was the fact that this invented distinction between “other military equipment” and “weapons of war” is a specific feature of German arms export control. Contrary to what the terminology suggests, the category of “other military equipment” can also include weapons that can be used for warfare.
 
Germany is Israel’s second-largest arms supplier after the US. According to data from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), German weapons have accounted for 30 per cent of Israeli arms imports in the last five years. Licences for new arms exports also increased in 2023.

Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
More from this author
Features / 2 November 2024
2 November 2024
In a call for a renewed peace movement, SEVIM DAGDELEN warns that US nuclear weapons deployments in Britain and Germany mark a dangerous return to cold war brinkmanship, carried out without democratic consent
Features / 18 December 2023
18 December 2023
Earlier this month the Kiev regime admitted the murder of an opposition politician, so why is it being ‘rewarded’ with EU accession talks as if nothing had happened, asks German Bundestag member SEVIM DAGDELEN
Features / 29 October 2023
29 October 2023
Bundestag member SEVIM DAGDELEN describes how the Left party’s pro-war stance has created an urgent need for a political force that fights for social justice and peace and pushes back against the catastrophic societal course set by the elites
Features / 30 June 2023
30 June 2023
Under the nonsensical belief that the US would not pursue its own interests at our expense, Europe is refusing to recognise the newly multipolar world — this will be our own downfall, argues SEVIM DAGDALEN