Skip to main content
NEU job advert
The double standards of the West are on full display at the ICJ
SEVIM DAGDELEN writes that the response of Germany to Nicaragua’s charges of aiding and abetting genocide in Gaza has been to downplay its role in supplying arms and question the premise that genocide is already taking place
PUTTING A GOOD FACE TO A BAD GAME: (Right) Tania von Uslar-Gleichen, Germany’s legal adviser and director-general for Legal Affairs of the German Foreign Ministry with Alain Pellet, a lawyer representing Nicaragua. Pellet is an expert in international law and a member and former president of the United Nations International Law Commission; (left) vox populi, vox Dei

THE German government’s appearance before the International Court of Justice in the proceedings for aiding and abetting genocide and violations of international humanitarian law in Gaza is a lesson in Western double standards. On April 8 and 9, Germany sat in the dock in The Hague after Nicaragua filed a case at the highest UN judicial body.
 
The 43-page document accuses Germany of failing to fulfil its obligations under the Genocide Convention to prevent genocide. Essentially, Germany is accused of aiding and abetting genocide and violating international humanitarian law with its political, financial, and military support for Israel as well as by ceasing to fund the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA). In view of the urgency of the situation, Nicaragua requested five interim measures to prevent the facilitation of genocide. These include the demand that Germany stop supplying arms to Israel and resume payments to UNRWA to ensure sufficient humanitarian aid for the Palestinian population.

Does arming a state committing genocide make you an accomplice?
 
The arguments put forward by the German government in its defence were unconvincing. With a flood of Powerpoint slides, the German representation initially tried to play down the significance of Germany’s arms deliveries to Israel.

It argued that the majority of the arms export licences issued after October 7 were for so-called “other military equipment” (“sonstige Rustungsguter”) and only a relatively small proportion for so-called “weapons of war” (“Kriegswaffen”). This was an attempt to deceive the court and the public.

What the German defence failed to mention was the fact that this invented distinction between “other military equipment” and “weapons of war” is a specific feature of German arms export control. Contrary to what the terminology suggests, the category of “other military equipment” can also include weapons that can be used for warfare.
 
Germany is Israel’s second-largest arms supplier after the US. According to data from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), German weapons have accounted for 30 per cent of Israeli arms imports in the last five years. Licences for new arms exports also increased in 2023.

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
Similar stories
Relatives carry the body of 13-year-old Seraje Ebrahim, killed in an Israeli strike on a drinking water distribution point, for burial outside Al-Awda Hospital in Nuseirat, central Gaza Strip, July 13, 2025
Gaza / 14 July 2025
14 July 2025

Over 30 nations to gather in Colombia to bring a halt to the genocide in Gaza

A Palestinian girl struggles to obtain donated food at a community kitchen in Khan Younis, in the southern Gaza Strip, May 9, 2025
Gaza Genocide / 10 May 2025
10 May 2025

ANSELM ELDERGILL draws attention to a legal case on Tuesday in which a human rights group is challenging the government’s decision to allow the sale of weapons used against Palestinians

Palestinian children queue at a food distribution kitchen in
Britain / 28 November 2024
28 November 2024
More than 60 signatories urge Foreign Minister to sanction Israel in line with ICC and ICJ