Skip to main content
Gifts from The Morning Star
The Borders Bill makes Britain ‘one of the most anti-refugee countries in the world’
Medicine San Frontiers hits out at the government's ‘unworkable, exorbitantly expensive and inhumane’ Bill
A group of people are brought in to Dover, Kent, onboard a Border Force vessel following a small boat incident in the Channel

THE Borders Bill will make Britain “one of the most anti-refugee countries in the world,” an international aid group has warned. 

Medicine San Frontiers (MSF) UK said it was shameful that Tory MPs had trampled on efforts by peers to remove some of the cruellest elements of the Nationality and Borders Bill in a debate on Tuesday night. 

Despite a number of Tory backbenchers speaking out against the proposals, the government proceeded to comfortably win a series of votes to reinsert clauses removed by the House of Lords. 

They include measures to criminalise asylum-seekers for entering Britain without permission and introducing a new system whereby refugees will be treated differently depending on their means of arrival.

MPs also voted to reinstate proposals that could open the door to offshore processing centres for asylum-seekers, with just three Conservatives rebelling during the vote. 

“In its current form, the Bill will enshrine the UK as one of the most anti-refugee countries in the world, at a time when the devastating impact of war and conflict is absolutely evident,” MSF UK’s advocacy officer Sophie McCann said in response to the votes. 

“The government cannot be serious about this Bill — it is unworkable, exorbitantly expensive and inhumane, targeting some of the most vulnerable people in the world. 

“There is nothing ‘fair’ about criminalising, detaining, pushing back and imprisoning refugees in offshore detention centres simply because of how they arrive in the UK.”

Later in the debate, MPs also rejected a Lords amendment which would have granted confirmed victims of modern-day slavery and trafficking support for at least 12 months. 

The Bill will now return to the Lords for further consideration. 

A spokesperson from the UN’s refugee agency said today it was regrettable that peers’ amendments were rejected by MPs, but added: “We believe that a compromise on amendments is still possible that would bring the legislation into compliance with commitments under international law and maintain protection for refugees in the UK.”

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
More from this author
People take part in a Million Women Rise march outside Chari
Britain / 4 March 2023
4 March 2023
Million Women Rise call out state failures to tackle misogyny and racism in society
Similar stories
HEAR US OUT: The voices of disabled concerned about assisted dying have to be considered when End of Life Bill enters the final stages of committee scrutiny, March 24 2025
Features / 15 May 2025
15 May 2025

DANIEL GOVER considers the procedural complexities awaiting a Private Member’s Bill in its passage through Commons and Lords

Lord Alf Dubs on stage addressing the crowd during a rally in Parliament Square, London, after taking part in the Refugees Welcome March, September 2016
Features / 6 May 2025
6 May 2025

A recent Immigration Summit heard from Lord Alf Dubs, who fled the Nazis to Britain as a child. JAYDEE SEAFORTH reports on his message that we need to increase public empathy with desperate people seeking asylum

CHARITY BEGINS AT HOME: (L to R) Refugees Sulieman Adam and
Features / 21 February 2025
21 February 2025
This is the most anti-migrant government in decades, argues RAVISHAAN RAHEL MUTHIAH
Anti-racism protesters demonstrate in Newcastle, ahead of a
Britain / 21 August 2024
21 August 2024
Campaigners warn Labour is ‘repeating the mistakes of the last government’