Skip to main content
Donate to the 95 years appeal
Biden is different from Trump - but no less dangerous
CHRIS NINEHAM warns that Biden's collaborative style is no less dangerous than Trump's maverick approach when it comes to foreign policy — the new President appears eager and ready to take conflict with China to the next stage
US President Joe Biden

THERE was relief around the world when Donald Trump lost the election last year.

His brand of confrontation and disruption and his support for the far right caused fear and loathing around the globe.

He stepped up bombing in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria, supported Saudi’s war on Yemen and came close to starting new wars with South Korea, Iran and Venezuela. On his watch tensions with China soared.

We shouldn’t, however, allow relief to colour our view of the new administration.

Joe Biden was the vice-president under Barack Obama with an unusual influence in foreign affairs.

These were the years when the “pivot to China” began and when the US first backed the Saudi war on Yemen. 

Biden makes much of the fact that he privately opposed US involvement in the attack on Libya in 2011.

But when it began to look like a Western win, he changed tune. “Nato got it right,” Biden said in a speech on the day president Obama announced Muammar Gadaffi’s death, “In this case, America spent $2 billion and didn’t lose a single life.”

This, Biden went on to say, was the way forward. 

At the time Biden was developing a new US military strategy, moving from what was called “counterinsurgency” to “counterterrorism.” 

In central Asia and the Middle East, this meant trying to move away from large-scale deployments of US forces and relying on air strikes, drone strikes, and “kill or capture” raids, while recruiting and training proxy forces wherever possible.

This was not a move away from aggression. It was a strategy of keeping casualties down and continuing to fight behind the backs of the US people, at a time when foreign war had become deeply unpopular. 

Biden has made much of his plans to work more closely with allies.

We should be clear, however, that working with allies is not the same as seeking peace.

In an article in Foreign Affairs last year, Biden made this point himself when he explained the purpose of heading up a Western alliance: “It makes us more secure and more successful. We amplify our own strength, extend our presence around the globe, and magnify our impact while sharing global responsibilities with willing partners.”

If strategy will be modified, the goals will not change much and the result is likely to be a good deal more continuity than many hope.

Even during the election campaign, Biden kept restating that Washington’s commitment to Israel would be “ironclad” and he has recently been applauding the Trump/Kushner initiative to reconcile Arab countries with Israel.

Grassroots pressure over Yemen has forced the president to announce the end of support for the Saudi-led war.

This is a win for the movement but not the end of the story.

Biden’s statement included support for Saudi military self-defence and it’s still not clear what concrete steps the new administration is willing to take.

Given this ambiguity and the fact that Britain is still openly backing the war, the anti-war movement needs to keep piling on the pressure to end the carnage in Yemen.

For years the US has been trying to shift its military emphasis away from terrorism back to what it calls “state actors,” in other words great power rivals. The chaos caused by the wars in the Middle East continue to make this very hard. 

All the same, Biden is committed to a more confrontational approach to Russia and pushing back hard against China.

He spent the last year doing his best to outdo Trump in hostility to the Chinese.

In April, his team released a digital ad attacking the then president as too willing to accept Chinese government explanations about the virus.

Trump “rolled over for the Chinese,” the ad says, a message delivered over footage of what appear to be Chinese security forces.

Biden has been quick to take on China verbally wherever possible and his top foreign policy aide Antony Blinken is clear that Biden is prepared to be confrontational, including over Taiwan.

Biden, he says, is prepared “step up defences of Taiwan’s democracy by exposing Beijing’s efforts to interfere.”

These moves reflect bipartisan support in Washington for a much tougher attitude to China which is now not just almost an economic equal, but in danger of becoming a real military competitor.

Containing China’s global ambitions will be the main foreign policy imperative of the new government and it will continue to shape the whole of US foreign policy.

This will involve accelerating the military encirclement of China, stepping up the diplomatic, political and economic offensives, challenging China for dominance in hotspots around the globe, and even taking the fight into space.    

Biden has declared a new era for foreign relations. But what he is actually doing is offering a slightly different answer to the question of how to restore US influence and control.

If it is less unilateral than Trump, this will not make it any less deadly or dangerous.

There is strong anti-war sentiment in the US and in Britain which has already had a profound and complicated impact on elite politics. But in the months and years ahead it will need to be mobilised on a serious scale to rein in the warmongers.

Chris Nineham is vice chair of the Stop the War Coalition.

Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
More from this author
A housing block is reduced to burning rubble by an Israeli a
Features / 2 October 2024
2 October 2024
CHRIS NINEHAM slams the deepening and dangerous Western hypocrisy in backing Israeli attacks while condemning any kind of resistance or retaliation, warning of a potential global conflict if we don’t take action immediately
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks during his
Features / 31 July 2024
31 July 2024
As Israel targets Hamas and Hezbollah leaders beyond Gaza in a campaign of deliberate provocation, CHRIS NINEHAM calls for a global protest movement against Israel's Western sponsors to prevent a wider war
Features / 9 September 2023
9 September 2023
Stop the War Coalition's CHRIS NINEHAM explains why a resolution before Congress this year risks committing the labour movement to a policy of escalating the war in Europe
As well as causing carnage in Ukraine and threatening to spr
Features / 17 October 2022
17 October 2022
CHRIS NINEHAM of the Stop the War Coalition argues that escalating the Ukraine war is a recipe for disaster — and we are already paying the price
Similar stories
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer with French President Emmanu
Features / 7 March 2025
7 March 2025
CARLOS MARTINEZ condemns Europe’s failure to develop genuine autonomy from US hegemony, as leaders like Starmer and Macron cling to a declining imperial order rather than building good relations with the emerging powers
UNWELCOME PRESENCE: US President Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago
Features / 20 February 2025
20 February 2025
VIJAY PRASHAD examines why in 2018 Washington started to take an increasingly belligerent stance towards ‘near peer rivals’ – Russa and China – with far-reaching geopolitical effects
IN THE KNOW: Bob Woodward with governor Wes Moore at the Pri
Book Review / 10 December 2024
10 December 2024
PAUL DONOVAN assesses an insider account of recent and future US foreign policy
Republican US presidential candiate Donald Trump (left) and
Eyes Left / 29 October 2024
29 October 2024
Getting bogged down in the Trump v Harris divide is a distraction from the tasks of ending US hegemony and Britain’s subservience to Washington’s demands, argues ANDREW MURRAY