Skip to main content
Gifts from The Morning Star
First lockdown arrest included ‘prosecution for a fictional offence’
‘Huge discretion’ in how police deploy powers will hit oppressed communities hardest, campaigners warn

THE first arrest made against someone for not complying with lockdown rules was carried out using the wrong law, it was revealed today. 

Marie Dinou from York was detained by officers for “refusing to speak” at Newcastle Central station last Saturday and subsequently fined £660. 

She was prosecuted under the Coronavirus Act for failing to provide her identity or reasons for travel to the police when asked, according to the Times newspaper. 

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
More from this author
POLICING THE POLICE: GLC leader Ken Livingstone (centre), wi
Features / 10 March 2023
10 March 2023
In an exclusive investigation, BETHANY RIELLY looks at how the state targeted leading politicians and campaigning groups — labelling many well-known figures 'extremists' and 'subversives' for attempting to hold the police to account
Eritrean female soldiers
Features / 12 December 2022
12 December 2022
On September 4, 16 Eritrean asylum-seekers were arrested at a protest against their country’s dictatorship and its supporters here. Since then, questions have been raised about whether the British authorities are doing enough to protect activists and asylum-seekers from the ‘long arm’ of the regime in Asmara
Similar stories
8computerdata
Features / 2 October 2025
2 October 2025

Digital ID means the government could track anyone and then limit their speech, movements, finances — and it could get this all wrong, identifying the wrong people for the wrong reasons, as the numerous digital cockups so far demonstrate, warns DYLAN MURPHY

WAR ON CLAIMANTS: Liz Kendall outside the Department of Work and Pensions, March 2025
Features / 20 May 2025
20 May 2025

While claiming to target fraud, Labour’s snooping Bill strips benefit recipients of privacy rights and presumption of innocence, writes CLAUDIA WEBBE, warning that algorithms with up to 25 per cent error rates could wrongfully investigate and harass millions of vulnerable people