Skip to main content

Error message

An error occurred while searching, try again later.
Morning Star Conference
What’s behind Trump’s welcome for ‘Afrikaner refugees’ from South Africa?

The plan is to stigmatise and destabilise South Africa in preparation for breaking it up while creating a confused and highly racialised atmosphere around immigration in the US to aid in denying rights to non-white refugees, explains EMILE SCHEPERS

Afrikaners from South Africa arrive, May 12, 2025, at Dulles International Airport in Dulles, Va.

THE news that a group of “Afrikaners” (Afrikaans-speaking white people from South Africa) have shown up in the US, invited by the Trump administration as “refugees,” shouldn’t come as a surprise. Donald Trump is obsessed with South Africa; he has been for years.

Back in the 1990s, when an adviser told him that non-white people could someday become the majority population in the US, he reportedly said that would spark a revolution: “This isn’t going to become South Africa.”

During his first round in the White House, he ordered the State Department to study what he called “the South Africa land and farm seizures and expropriations and the large-scale killing of farmers.” The same fantasy is again being used to justify aggressive policies against the black-majority nation in his second term.

In February, he issued an executive order terminating all aid to South Africa, citing “unjust racial discrimination” against white citizens. Then, in March, he expelled the country’s ambassador to the US, Ebrahim Rasool, who Secretary of State Marco Rubio branded (without evidence) a “race-baiting politician who hates America and POTUS.”

And now, we have the official welcoming of white Afrikaner “refugees” while simultaneously the largest deportation operation ever is being executed against immigrants of colour.

Destabilisation the goal

The arrival of these supposedly persecuted Afrikaners is part political performance for his domestic Maga audience, but it’s also a tactic in a larger strategy of destabilisation against South Africa.

The Trump administration is working to undermine the South African government for various reasons. Among these is the fact that South Africa has taken the Israeli government to the International Criminal Court in The Hague for genocide and crimes against humanity in Gaza.

South Africa has also maintained cordial relations with countries the US government does not like, such as Cuba and the People’s Republic of China. South Africa is a member of Brics, and thus part of a serious challenge to US worldwide financial dominance.

And there is no escaping the fact that the right in the US has never forgiven the South African government for putting an end to the racist apartheid regime, which ruled that country from 1948 (and under other names, before that) until 1994. Finally, the personal racism of Trump and his clique surely enters into this ugly picture.

Trump and his right-wing allies now think they have found the perfect opportunity to attack South Africa. In the 2024 elections, the long-ruling African National Congress (ANC) lost its parliamentary majority for the first time since 1994. Thus, the ANC was forced into an unwieldy and extremely uncomfortable coalition arrangement with some parties who, if they could, would reverse many of the advances achieved since the end of apartheid.

Some of these right-wing pro-apartheid leftovers have been in direct contact with the Trump administration, through Rubio and other government officials, and very likely through US techno-fascists like Elon Musk and Peter Thiel, both of whom grew up in white-ruled South Africa.

There is an emerging multi-pronged attack against the unity of South Africa, which contains the following elements, with perhaps more to come. 

A campaign of lies and exaggerations, eg that a very moderate new law on the expropriation and redistribution of abandoned or unused land constitutes a “racist” attack on white people, and that white farmers, especially Afrikaners, are being “massacred” in South Africa.

A campaign, led among others by a British citizen living in South Africa, to break off the country’s Western Cape Province (where the picturesque city of Cape Town is) and make it into a new independent state. The point seems to be that Western Cape Province has a larger proportion of white Afrikaans and English-speaking people than any of the country’s other eight provinces.

Western Cape’s population is 42.1 per cent “coloured,” referring to people of a mixed racial background, most of whom speak Afrikaans, 38.8 per cent black, 16.45 per cent “white,” and 1.1 per cent “Indian/Asian,” while the nation’s overall population is 81.4 per cent black, 8.2 per cent coloured, 7.3 per cent white, and 2.7 per cent Asian/Indian. It was a longstanding trick of the white governments to try to play off the black and coloured populations against each other politically, and this may be continuing.

There is an effort to split off the small town of “Orania” from the rest of the country. Orania is a bizarre and anachronistic phenomenon in the Northern Cape Province. Founded by Carel Boshoff, the son-in-law of apartheid-era South African President Hendrik Verwoerd, Orania is noted for not allowing any non-white people to live and work within its town limits (having kicked out all local non-whites at the time of its founding). The town was specifically created to keep non-whites out, so as to preserve the “heritage” of its white Afrikaner inhabitants.

The South African government, from Mandela on, evidently decided to tolerate this bizarre state of affairs, perhaps to calm race relations. But Orania has been an organising centre for all sorts of far-right projects, including Afriforum and a bogus trade union called “Solidariteit.” Now, there is a move by some on the right in South Africa to declare Orania to be a sovereign entity not answerable to the national government. And unsurprisingly, the leaders of Orania are also in touch with the Trump administration to get US support for a possible secession from South Africa.

Rude awakening

The 49 new Afrikaner “refugees” who arrived at Dulles airport outside Washington DC are probably in for a big disappointment. They will soon find that they have to do their own cooking, gardening, and house cleaning, because ordinary people here do not have a handy source of super-cheap labour to do those things for them.

There are no Afrikaans-language schools here for their kids. The churches are either Roman Catholic, non-Calvinistic liberal protestant, or equally non-Calvinistic Evangelical Christian churches, far from the Calvinist Dutch Reformed churches the “refugees” are used to in South Africa.

And almost anywhere they go in this country, they will have to deal with non-white people on the basis of equality, in spite of the US’s own racism issues.

The arrival of these “refugees” in the US has been met with a hostile reaction by many people in both countries. The head of the African National Congress, the biggest party in South Africa’s ruling coalition, Gwede Mantashe essentially said “good riddance.” South African President Cyril Ramaphosa called them “cowards” who cut and run rather than helping to deal with South Africa’s problems.

In the US, there is simply rage, especially since it seems the air fare for the “refugees” was paid for by US taxpayers. Trump has suggested that he will give the new arrivals instant US citizenship. The latter would be completely illegal: to become a US citizen, one first of all has to get permanent resident status, then, in most cases, wait five years, pass an English and civics test, be interviewed by an immigration agent, and pay a hefty fee.

Race-based refugee status

Then, of course, there is the Trump administration’s horrific and ongoing multi-faceted anti-immigrant campaign. This has been focused on rounding up not only undocumented immigrants but also foreign students who have expressed disagreement with US foreign policy. In at least one case, that of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, Trump’s ICE agents snatched a married man with children away from his family, in violation of a court order, and sent him to a concentration camp in El Salvador. Told by the judge that they had to bring Abrego back, Trump and his people simply refuse to obey.

Further, Trump has announced the end of Temporary Protected Status for some of the most vulnerable and endangered refugees in the country, including Haitians and Afghans who are very likely to be killed if returned to their countries of origin. He is persecuting dark-skinned, non-European people while opening the gates to privileged and wealthy European-origin whites. Not a good look, Mr President.

Born in South Africa and now living in Northern Virginia, Emile Schepers is a veteran civil and immigrant rights activist. CJ Atkins contributed to this piece.

This article appeared on Peoplesworld.org.

 

 

 

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
More from this author
Features / 9 February 2025
9 February 2025
EMILE SCHEPERS looks at the history of dispossession that has prompted the South African government's land reforms
Supporters of President Nicolas Maduro chants slogans during
Features / 18 September 2019
18 September 2019
The resurrection of the Inter American Treaty of Reciprocal Assistance against Venezuela could lead to an armed invasion of the oil-rich country, writes EMILE SCHEPERS
Members of the special force's ‘Kaibiles’ — a company
Features / 5 July 2019
5 July 2019
Ravaged by years of war, genocide and oppression of the indigenous and the poor, Guatemala is no safe haven for migrants, says EMILE SCHEPERS
People chant slogans during a demonstration in Kordofan, Sud
Features / 7 January 2019
7 January 2019