Skip to main content
From the SDP to the Independent Group: the importance of politics from below
KEITH FLETT wonders how Labour's centrist split intend to function with no membership, structure or policies
oy Jenkins (left) and Dr David Owen at the launch of the new Social Democratic Party, March 1981

A FEW days after the Independent Group (TIG) of MPs formed in the Commons, the Liberal Democrat strategist Mark Pack tweeted “who will be TIG’s Bill Rodgers?” It was an interesting question.

Despite having spent a year in formation with meetings at luxury hotels the breakaway MPs appeared without a proper name, no policies, no membership and no structure. Their cheerleaders in the media argue all these will appear over time.

The SDP which was formed in 1981 was a rather different and more substantial matter. On its founding day the Limehouse Declaration was published outlining its basic principles. Its roots went back much further than that though.

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
Similar stories
Land O’Cakes Hotel, Great Ancoats Street, Manchester in July 1962 / pic: Manchester Archives+/CC
Downing Street of the north / 16 July 2026
16 July 2026

KEITH FLETT looks at geographical roots of working-class activism in Britain

Keir Starmer
Labour / 1 July 2026
1 July 2026

Keir Starmer's early political life suggests a very different future from the one he ultimately embraced, says KEITH FLETT

Nigel Farage
Features / 27 May 2026
27 May 2026

Labour movement history in Britain shows workers secured reforms through collective pressure and political representation, rather than being gifted from above, writes KEITH FLETT

PROTEST PIONEERS: The assault of the Chartists on the Westgate Hotel, where some of their comrades were held prisoner, Newport, 1839
Features / 24 October 2025
24 October 2025

It’s not just the Starmer regime: the workers of Britain have always faced legal affronts on their right to assemble and dissent, and the Labour Party especially has meddled with our freedoms from its earliest days, writes KEITH FLETT