Skip to main content
Donate to the 95 years appeal
Wikileaks helped end secret US killings, Assange extradition hearing is told
A mobile advertising board with a "Don't Extradite Assange" message outside the Old Bailey, London

REVELATIONS published by Wikileaks helped to end a secret US assassination programme and freed unlawfully detained prisoners from Guantanamo Bay, the Julian Assange extradition hearing was told today.

Giving evidence during the second day of the Wikileaks founder’s hearing at the Old Bailey, human rights lawyer Clive Stafford Smith also said that the site’s content had helped to stop drone strikes in Pakistan and provided evidence currently being investigated by the International Criminal Court.

The lawyer, who has represented numerous Guantanamo Bay prisoners, said that the leaked documents had enabled him to win legal actions on behalf of “a number of innocent people in detention” at the US-run detention camp.

He said the leaks had opened his eyes to “torture, rendition and murder” carried out by the US government. 

Mr Stafford Smith went on to argue that the scale of new information released by Wikileaks was partly as a result of US authorities’ “obsession with classifying information.”

“When I first went to see a British man in Guantanamo he gave me 30 pages on the torture that he had suffered,” the lawyer said. 

“All of this material was immediately classified on the basis that revealing torture was a threat to national security.”

At one point during Mr Stafford Smith’s testimony, Mr Assange tried to intervene from the dock. 

The judge warned Mr Assange that this was not permitted and allowed a short adjournment for him to brief his lawyers.

Another expert witness, University of Maryland journalism professor Mark Feldstein, told the court that soliciting leaks was part of a journalist’s “standard operating procedure” and that he had taught related techniques as an academic.

The hearing is being held in line with Covid-19 safety guidelines.

Before the proceedings commenced, 40 civic society groups were promised remote access to the court’s proceedings via a video link. 

But presiding judge Venessa Baraitser revoked that permission on Monday, citing fears that the “integrity of the court” could be compromised if the feed was streamed elsewhere.

Reporters Without Borders campaigns director Rebecca Vincent said: “We have never faced such extensive barriers in attempting to monitor any other case in any other country as we have with the proceedings in the UK in respect of Julian Assange. 

“This is extremely worrying in a case of such tremendous public interest.”

Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
More from this author
SLAIN BY IDF: Shireen Abu Akleh
Features / 9 August 2024
9 August 2024
The wholesale murder by Israel's armed forces of journalists in Gaza is a cause for international concern, writes TIM DAWSON
VINDICATED: Journalists Barry McCaffrey (left) and Trevor Bi
Features / 19 July 2024
19 July 2024
TIM DAWSON looks at how obsessive police surveillance of journalists undermines the very essence of democracy
Features / 25 June 2024
25 June 2024
At long last the WikiLeaks founder is free. For all those who care about freedom of speech it’s time to celebrate, writes TIM DAWSON of the International Federation of Journalists
Stella Assange, the wife of Julian Assange, speaks during a
Britain / 20 May 2024
20 May 2024
Similar stories
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange waves after landing at RAAF
World / 26 June 2024
26 June 2024
Stella Assange warns case sets dangerous precedent for press freedom
Features / 25 June 2024
25 June 2024
At long last the WikiLeaks founder is free. For all those who care about freedom of speech it’s time to celebrate, writes TIM DAWSON of the International Federation of Journalists