Skip to main content
Advertise Buy the paper Contact us Shop Subscribe Support us
The skewed focus of the Stirling Prize
While applauding the emphasis on re-use, ROBERT GROVER examines the elitist bias of the prize towards south-east England

THE Stirling Prize is awarded every year by the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) for the UK’s best new architecture. This year’s six-project shortlist includes only one new building. The rest is made up of a masterplan outlining the placement of buildings and streets around Kings Cross, London Underground’s Elizabeth Line and three other projects that work extensively with existing structures.

Since its inception in 1996, we have seen success move from high-profile civic buildings, museums, galleries and libraries to works that move towards a wider definition of architectural quality, which includes residential development and community spaces.

In the last 10 years, winners have included a social housing project (2019), a community-owned pier (2017) and a school (2015), as well as the more usual mix of cultural and university buildings. This reflects the renewed ethical consciousness of the profession, struggling to assert itself in the context of a climate emergency, the tragic Grenfell tower fire and marginalisation in the construction process as the traditional role of the architect is replaced by developers, builders or new technologies.

Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
Similar stories
Exhibition Review / 11 July 2024
11 July 2024
Co-curator TOM WHITE introduces a father-and-son exhibition of photography documenting the experience and political engagement of Chilean exiles
Book Review / 21 May 2024
21 May 2024
MICHAL BONCZA recommends a photographic sojourn around London housing estates that defined post WWII British civic architecture
Interview / 15 March 2024
15 March 2024
ANGUS REID speaks to historian Siphokazi Magadla about the women who fought apartheid and their impact on South African society