The Tory conference was a pseudo-sacred affair, with devotees paying homage in front of Thatcher’s old shrouds — and your reporter, initially barred, only need mention he’d once met her to gain access. But would she consider what was on offer a worthy legacy, asks ANDREW MURRAY
Spain has joined South Africa’s ICJ genocide case against Israel while imposing weapons bans and port restrictions, moves partly driven by trade unions — proving just how effectively civil society can reshape government policy, writes RAMZY BAROUD

IN several influential European countries, solidarity with Gaza and the Palestinian people is finally translating into action. Though such action may seem belated to the tens of thousands of lives lost in the genocide-stricken Strip, it is, nonetheless, critical for the future of the Palestinian cause.
The political shift under way in Europe is a development of strategic importance. This is not because Europe’s voice carries a higher value on the scale of global solidarity, but because of the central role the continent has historically played in the inception of Israel, as well as the sustained political and financial support for its settler-colonial project.
For decades, this support has provided a political and economic shield, allowing Israel to operate outside the bounds of international law. As Europe forms a core part of the Western political, legal and economic landscape, any fundamental shift in perception here, coupled with the deeply embedded solidarity in the global South, could finally serve as the catalysts needed to isolate Israel on the international stage — a critical prerequisite for badly needed accountability.
Though Ireland has historically served as a model of sensible and ethical politics on Palestine, other examples cannot be overlooked.
They include Sweden, Norway, Belgium, and Slovenia. These countries’ positions, especially since the start of the Israeli genocide in Gaza, have been largely shaped by the degree of popular protests and civil society mobilisation. Their actions, though varied, signal a growing chasm between European public opinion and the traditional pro-Israel policies of many governments.
Spain, however, represents a critical and comprehensive case. The change under way in Madrid is a near-ideal model because it is built on three interconnected pillars: a vibrant and well-organised, civil-society-based solidarity, a fundamental change in official political discourse and, most importantly, meaningful, quantifiable action.
On June 6 2024, Spain made a bold and historic move by formally deciding to join South Africa’s case at the International Court of Justice, accusing Israel of committing genocide against the Palestinian people.
That step, though moral and logical, was particularly significant when compared to the positions of other major European powers. Germany, for instance, has laboured to defend Israel against such an accusation, while Britain, through its Foreign Minister David Lammy, argued that Britain was not yet convinced Israel’s actions constituted genocide.
Spain’s current position was not entirely a surprise. It was a culmination of a shifting political attitude that had been building for some time. In November 2023, then-minister for social rights, Ione Belarra, openly accused Israel of “planned genocide” in a powerful speech. This public declaration marked a significant shift in official discourse, moving beyond polite diplomatic platitudes to a language of moral clarity.
This new discourse ultimately led to Madrid’s recognition of Palestine as a state, a joint declaration that included Ireland and Norway. The decision not only added to the growing list of nations recognising Palestinian statehood but also opened the stage for yet more similar recognitions.
While some countries are using their position on a Palestinian state as a distracting tactic from their failure to take any punitive action, Spain’s actions appear to be on a different political wavelength. Indeed, on September 8, Spain declared a set of new sanctions against Israel, including a ban on weapons sales and a prohibition on military ships carrying equipment from using Spanish ports.
For many in Spain, even these steps are seen as too paltry and insignificant in the face of a war that has wiped out more than 20,000 children. The Spanish people are right to expect more meaningful steps from their government, and their demands are rooted in a history specific to Spain’s collective experience.
In 1974, Spain joined many countries in the global South in voting in favour of UN general assembly resolutions 3236 and 3237, which recognised Palestinian self-determination. A few years later, prime minister Adolfo Suarez made a historic gesture by receiving PLO chairman Yasser Arafat in Madrid.
These initial gestures of support continued for a time. However, following the Madrid Talks, Spain slowly rebranded itself as a neutral intermediary, eventually repeating the same European rhetoric about Israel’s “right to defend itself” and the like.
Spain’s ability to maintain this position was made possible, in part, by the fact that the Palestinian Authority was far more concerned about maintaining its status as the official representative of the Palestinian people — and the international funds and legitimacy that came with it — than with holding Israel accountable to international law.
Then, it seemed impractical for civil society to try to hold its government to higher standards than those demanded by the Palestinian leadership itself.
The Israeli genocide in Gaza, however, shattered that dynamic. The unceasing Israeli extermination campaign in Gaza and the Palestinian resistance in the Strip rendered the Palestinian Authority virtually irrelevant on the global stage and recentred Gaza as the true representative of the Palestinian collective experience and the full extent of Israel’s criminal actions.
This meant that the Spanish people themselves became partly in charge of their government’s position on Palestine. In September 2024, over 200 trade unions and NGOs called for a 24-hour general strike, raising the ceiling of their demands to the complete severance of all political, economic, and military ties with Israel.
Every step taken by Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez’s government since has been a direct response to, and an attempt to satisfy, these demands.
What is taking place in Spain is true grassroots solidarity, unburdened by doublespeak or political bravado. It is a genuine civil society action centred on a shared historical experience and struggle against state-sponsored violence and fascism. While every nation has a unique story, the Spanish experience is proving to be a model worthy of study, emulation, and certainly of deep respect.
Ramzy Baroud is a journalist, author and the editor of the Palestine Chronicle (www.palestinechronicle.com).

By refusing to recognise a Palestinian state and continuing to supply Israel with weapons, Meloni has provoked an uprising that is without precedent in the history of solidarity with Palestine — and it could change Italy profoundly too, writes RAMZY BAROUD

Ben-Gvir’s threat to treat the flotilla as terrorists shows how seriously Israel takes the danger of growing solidarity activism from civil society to its standing on the international stage, writes RAMZY BAROUD

Mass mobilisations are forcing governments to seriously consider imposing sanctions and severing ties — even in places like Australia and the Netherlands — despite continued arms shipments to Israel’s war machine, writes RAMZY BAROUD

With foreign media banned from Gaza, Palestinians themselves have reversed most of zionism’s century-long propaganda gains in just two years — this is why Israel has killed 270 journalists since October 2023, explains RAMZY BAROUD