Skip to main content
Morning Star Conference
Labour welfare ‘reforms’ are a cruel, destructive move
DIANE ABBOTT MP condemns the government’s vicious attack on benefits that callously denies the pandemic’s impact on the working class while pushing vulnerable people into unsuitable work through punitive measures
WELFARE AUSTERITY: (L to R) Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Liz Kendall; Keir Starmer

THERE is now overwhelming evidence that the government is reimposing austerity measures. This is true in relation to income tax, public spending after next year, higher energy bills, bus fares and other prices determined by government.

But perhaps one of the most misunderstood aspects of austerity has been the planned cuts to the welfare bill.

Yet Keir Starmer, Liz Kendall and a host of other ministers have done their best to dispel any complacency on this issue. People who are on welfare, for whatever reason, are in the government’s firing line.

Their attack has two prongs. The first is that there is a blanket assertion that the welfare bill is “too high” and the second is that they will crack down on benefit fraud. Deliberately or otherwise, it is clear that these two issues are closely connected.

Promising “radical reforms to get Britain working,” in a recent article, Starmer went on to say, “In the coming months, Mail on Sunday readers will see even more sweeping changes. Because make no mistake, we will get to grips with the bulging benefits bill blighting our society.”

Apart from a puerile devotion to alliteration from one of Starmer’s junior advisers, what we learnt from this is that the government’s attack on welfare, in general, is completely divorced from reality.

Britain has among the lowest state pensions in the whole of Western Europe, with now the highest eligible retirement ages, too. Ministers and right-wing commentators are fond of pointing out how many people of working age are not currently in work.

They are not counting those who, after years of debilitating manual work, simply can no longer carry on in work. There are also those who want to enjoy their retirement and have left work at what would have been their previous retirement age, even though they have to take a financial hit to do so.

In this country, we also have among the worst provisions for statutory maternity leave and paternity leave, both in terms of entitlement and pay. We also have some of the lowest temporary sick pay payments and welfare payments for long-term sickness.

Yet it is this provision (among others) which seems to have agitated ministers and pundits so much. This amounts to little more than victim-blaming.

Rather scarily, they all seem to reproduce the same chart, which shows the number of people on long-term sickness benefits rising from 2 million prior to the beginning of the pandemic to 2.6 million now. The chart always begins just below the 2 million level for extra emphasis.

But this means the excess number of people claiming long-term sickness benefit is only 600,000, or just 2 per cent of the workforce. For many people on employment and support allowance (ESA) who suffer long-term sickness, they are expected to live on £90 per week. I know I could not. I would like to see those who complain so vociferously about a “bulging benefits bill” try.

The extremely low level of ESA means that the total cost of funding the excess number of long-term sickness benefits since the pandemic amounts to £2.7 billion. This is a bit less than has been pledged annually to fight the war in Ukraine indefinitely.

Given how badly people were treated during the depths of the pandemic, it is a wonder that the number of additional long-term sick people is only 600,000. Wages were slashed for those on payrolls, and next to nothing was provided for those who were not.

Worse, the whole pandemic was completely mishandled so that “lockdowns” that were full of holes kept people off work longer, and orders for premature returns to work were repeatedly issued.

It is a great pity that Starmer not only sided with Boris Johnson on these issues but went further, demanding a “no ifs, no buts” return to schools and work before Covid-19 had properly subsided. As a result, the Labour leadership is equally culpable for the inevitable growth in the numbers of long-term sick people. This includes physical as well as mental sickness.

Of course, wherever possible, people should be helped back into work. But that means significantly more investment in the NHS than has been promised, to a level that will dramatically reduce waiting lists and be sustained over the life of this parliament. The government has explicitly failed to deliver on each of these.

But it also means investing in skills, further education, and a proper apprenticeship system. Yet skills were hardly mentioned in the Budget, and £300 million extra provided is a paltry amount.

The government’s stick to get people into work is clearly much larger than any carrot. The same approach can be seen in relation to youth unemployment. Kendall was explicit. Young people who do not take up the jobs they are offered will lose their benefits.

Disabled people, as usual, bear the brunt of austerity, and the Tory changes to the implementation of the work capability assessments are being kept. This cruel measure is explicitly aimed at reducing the number of people eligible for benefits and reducing the welfare bill.

Finally, it seems that ministers could not resist the well-worn path of “clamping down on benefit fraudsters” (copyright Margaret Thacher). Either ministers do not know or do not care that the level of welfare fraud is a tiny fraction of tax fraud or that the cost of recovering it makes it uneconomic.

Starmer told Mail on Sunday readers, in a jumble of metaphors, that Tory policy was divisive, “performative politics at its worst. Meaningless rhetoric to grab headlines, and desperate throws of the dice to cover the cracks.” The same criticism could be levelled at these policies.

The truth is that this government does not have a plan for growth, confirmed by its own forecasts in the Budget. Instead, it is repeating the experiment of austerity in order to control the deterioration in government finances. Expecting a different outcome to the last 14 years meets Einstein’s definition of madness.

Forcing people into work is a punitive outcome for those involved. For many, it will simply be inappropriate.

It is also a threat to the labour movement. Unscrupulous employers will take advantage of anyone starved into work. General pay and conditions will be harder to maintain, let alone improve. They should be resisted by the labour movement as a whole.

Diane Abbott is Labour MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington. Follow her on X @HackneyAbbott.

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
More from this author
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer speaking during a press conference on the Immigration White Paper, May 12, 2025
Politics / 31 May 2025
31 May 2025

DIANE ABBOTT MP argues that Labour’s proposals contained in the recent white paper won’t actually bring down immigration numbers or win support from Reform voters — but they will succeed in making politics more nasty and poisonous 
 

Cartoon: Lewis
Features / 17 May 2025
17 May 2025

DIANE ABBOTT MP warns Starmer’s newly declared war on foreigners and scroungers won’t fix housing or services — only class struggle against austerity can do that, and defeat Farage in the process

Karen Shore webpic for Abbott.jpg
Features / 3 May 2025
3 May 2025

DIANE ABBOTT looks at the whys and hows of Labour’s spectacular own goal

Features / 19 April 2025
19 April 2025
British Steel has vindicated what the left has said all along — nationalisation of our key industries is common sense, and it’s the neoliberals who are now clearly the ideologically driven zealots, writes DIANE ABBOTT MP
Similar stories
PUTTING A GOOD FACE ON IT: Liz Kendall
Features / 22 March 2025
22 March 2025
With young people, the disabled and the elderly in Labour’s sights as ‘easy targets’ for cuts, the labour movement must remember it’s in the vital interests of us all to defend the groups being picked off, writes DIANE ABBOTT MP
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall arrives in Downing S
Britain / 11 March 2025
11 March 2025
HARMFUL RHETORIC: Keir Starmer and Liz Kendall
Features / 3 February 2025
3 February 2025
Far from addressing the causes of ill-health and disability, Starmer, Reeves and Kendall are committed to unleashing more misery for disabled people, argues Dr DYLAN MURPHY
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall during a visit to Pe
Britain / 26 November 2024
26 November 2024