Skip to main content
NEU job vacancy
Banker’s bonuses: another Labour betrayal
We are lurching backwards politically now that both major parties are united in servicing the City before all else, writes BERNIE EVANS
Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer and shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves during a visit to the London Stock Exchange Group, September 22, 2023

WITH plans to “unashamedly champion Britain’s financial services sector,” cut down on “10,000 pages of regulation,” and impose no windfall taxes on banks despite their record profits, it came as little surprise that a Labour government will not reinstate the cap on bankers’ bonuses.

In July last year, for example, Natwest announced half-year profits of £3.58 billion, up from £2.6bn the previous year.

Imagine how much they and the other profiteering banks will be paying in bonuses to people who will have contributed nothing towards the higher profits, which were simply made by the exploitation of British customers, delaying an increase in savings rates after raising them for borrowers immediately after the Bank of England announced hikes in the base rates.

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
Similar stories
UTTER REJECTION: A contingent od disabled protesters move to
Features / 31 March 2025
31 March 2025
The economic value of disability benefits far outweighs their cost, argues Dr DYLAN MURPHY
People walking near the Bank of England
Britain / 20 February 2025
20 February 2025
Campaigners slam the Chancellor after Britain’s four biggest banks made a record £45.9bn in profits for 2024
Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves at the Confederati
Features / 9 January 2025
9 January 2025
Labour’s ex-banker Chancellor plans deregulation while City profits soar and customers suffer — between money laundering scandals and the exploitation of Covid loans, it’s clearly time to end this madness, says BERNIE EVANS
Features / 3 November 2024
3 November 2024
In the first of two articles, ROBERT GRIFFITHS argues that despite a parliamentary majority, Labour’s timid Budget fails to seize a historic opportunity and lacks the ambition needed to address Britain’s deep social and economic crises