Skip to main content
The historical context of Rachel Reeves
Britain’s first woman Chancellor delivers the same old fudge, as Labour’s commitment to economic orthodoxy, seen throughout its history, always betrays working people, writes KEITH FLETT

FOR socialists there is a good deal to be discontented about Rachel Reeves’s policies as Chancellor. The cut in winter fuel payments has rightly caused anger and talk of cuts to spending suggests an austere 2025.

While she has been engaged with socialists who have thought a good deal about the historic roots of Britain’s crisis and what might be done — such as David Edgerton at Kings College, London — it’s difficult to discern much practical influence.

Of course, a certain portion of the attacks on her are firstly because she is the first female Chancellor and the world of finance is still largely that of men in suits. Secondly, she is a Labour Chancellor. Of what stripe is entirely irrelevant to the likes of the Mail, Telegraph and GB News: it’s just Labour of any kind they hate.

The real way to understand the origins of Reeves’s crisis is to look at several historical contexts.

It’s hardly news to point out that Reeves follows an orthodox Treasury line when it comes to the economy. She was, after all, a Bank of England economist. The perspective, if one were to play devil’s advocate, is that what working women and men want is a stable economy with low inflation where, as the government has it, work pays.

It sounds OK until it is recalled that capitalism is a system of crisis, of boom and slump. Simply being a manager of a largely mythical status quo is unlikely to work well.

Yet this has been a strong line in right-wing Labour thought back to Labour’s first chancellor Philip Snowden in 1924. Snowden too was a Treasury man. He saw no reason to increase public spending, even to address the significant problem of unemployment after the first world war.

He did however differ in one significant aspect from Reeves. His background had been in the Independent Labour Party and while he saw little chance of changing market capitalism, he did argue that a socialist society was needed.

The other historical context is the economic crisis that has more or less traditionally beset Labour governments in the modern era. As a party that promises to slightly tame the tiger of capital, the reality that it is a system of boom and bust perpetually confounds it.

Gordon Brown had claimed that the post-1997 Labour governments had got rid of it, only to be faced with the 2008 world financial crash. Brown got out of it by making sure the less well-off paid for the crisis caused by the much better-off, a pattern we remain stuck in.

The 1976 IMF crisis when James Callaghan was prime minister underlines the point. The economy had been hit by the impact of the policies of the 1970-74 Tory government and the 1973 Middle East oil crisis. Then chancellor Denis Healey determined that the way to resolve matters was to take a loan from the IMF. This came with significant strings, in particular cuts in public spending.

The loan was opposed by left ministers including Tony Benn and Michael Foot but in vain. It set the course for the Labour election defeat to Thatcher in 1979.

As with this earlier crisis, there were alternatives but Labour stuck to economic orthodoxy and Reeves is firmly in that historical mould. Instead of spending cuts, wealth taxes and levies on the profits of energy companies could be utilised.

This of course would lead to even more attacks by the right-wing media. Mobilising support on the ground for what would be popular measures could address this but that is not the politics of Reeves and Starmer.

Keith Flett is a socialist historian. Follow him on X @kmflett.

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
More from this author
WINNING OVER THE WORKING CLASS? Margaret Thatcher (left) personally sells off a London council house in her bid to undermine the welfare state and woo Labour voters via the 1980 Housing Act and so-called ‘right to buy’ for tenants
Features / 26 May 2025
26 May 2025

Research shows Farage mainly gets rebel voters from the Tory base and Labour loses voters to the Greens and Lib Dems — but this doesn’t mean the danger from the right isn’t real, explains historian KEITH FLETT

Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch at their local election campaign launch at The Curzon Centre in Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire, March 20, 2025
Features / 14 May 2025
14 May 2025

KEITH FLETT traces how the ‘world’s most successful political party’ has imploded since Thatcher’s fall, from nine leaders in 30 years to losing all 16 English councils, with Reform UK symbolically capturing Peel’s birthplace, Tamworth — but the beast is not dead yet

STILL MARCHING: A May Day demo makes its way through London, 1973
Features / 1 May 2025
1 May 2025

KEITH FLETT revisits the 1978 origins of Britain’s May Day bank holiday — from Michael Foot’s triumph to Thatcher’s reluctant acceptance — as Starmer’s government dodges calls to expand our working-class celebrations

Features / 14 April 2025
14 April 2025
From bemoaning London’s ‘cockneys’ invading seaside towns to negotiating holiday rents, the founders of scientific socialism maintained a wry detachment from Victorian Easter customs while using the break for health and politics, writes KEITH FLETT
Similar stories
TURNING POINT: The anti-cuts plan put forward by Tony Benn (
Features / 31 March 2025
31 March 2025
Facing economic turmoil, Jim Callaghan’s government rejected Tony Benn’s alternative economic strategy in favour of cuts that paved the way for Thatcherism — and the cuts-loving Labour of the present era, writes KEITH FLETT
Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves at the Confederati
Features / 14 January 2025
14 January 2025
Instead of responding to changed circumstances by adjusting policy, Reeves is using fiscal ‘rules’ as an excuse to force government departments to make even deeper cuts than she had already flagged, says CLAUDIA WEBBE
TREASURY MIND: Rachel Reeves
Features / 5 September 2024
5 September 2024
The Chancellor is rehashing discredited Victorian economics, showing the party has learned nothing from a century of failed Gladstonian economics, ignoring Keynes and betraying workers, writes KEITH FLETT