Skip to main content
Donate to the 95 years appeal
War: is it in our genes?
Capitalism drives modern warfare — but our species has waged determined and passionate campaigns of murder against each other long before its arrival. How can we begin to explain this, asks JOHN GREEN
WISHFUL THINKING? Created by the Soviet sculptor Evgeniy Vuchetich, the bronze statue ‘Let Us Beat Our Swords into Ploughshares’ was installed in 1959 in the north garden of the United Nations sculptor Evgeniy Vuchetich, the bronze statue ‘Let Us Beat Our Swords into Ploughshares’ was installed in 1959 in the north garden of the United Nations

AT this moment armed conflicts are taking place on all continents apart from North America and Antarctica. We live in a world in which war has become an accepted fact of life.

Homo sapiens is the only species on the planet that deliberately kills its own in huge numbers —and with the grisliest cruelty. All other animals may battle over territory or to obtain a mate, but they rarely kill; their battles are more ritualistic, simply driving the vanquished away.

They are satisfied with the territory or the mate they have or the food they have gathered, they are not driven to want excess. On the other hand, humans are driven invariably by greed and go to war for more land, food, and wealth than they need. Why?

Since time immemorial humans have waged war on each other. The Greeks, celebrated for their sophisticated civilisation, their philosophers, poets and architects, waged almost continuous and bloody wars with their neighbours, rather than learning to live in amity with them. The Romans waged imperial wars of conquest over centuries.

During the Anglo-Saxon period in Britain, between 450 and 1066, the island people were not only waging continuous war against each other but were ravaged and plundered by the invading Vikings year after year in bloodthirsty and vicious battles, massacring tens of thousands.

What with famines and plagues as well, it is amazing that anyone was left alive on this island of ours.

During the late Middle Ages (1337-1453) there was the hundred years’ war between Britain and France — a century of almost non-stop conflict. The thirty years’ war, from 1618 to 1648, was one of the longest and most destructive conflicts in European history.

All these wars were accompanied by the most savage retribution, the use of torture, and maiming as tools of conflict. Humans seem to take a delight in gratuitous violence meted out to their fellows. And we are still waging such wars today.

There was great hope before the outbreak of WWI when the Socialist International pledged not to support the drive to war — why should workers of one country fight workers in another on behalf of their capitalist masters, it was argued.

That pledge was very readily discarded, triggering a jingoist nationalism that infected the minds of almost everyone, including socialists.

In the wake of the horrendous mass killings in WWI and the destruction and genocide during WWII, the United Nations was set up in 1945, in an attempt to prevent wars in the future.

In its preamble, the UN Charter states: “We the peoples of the United Nations determined to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind, and to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small, and to establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law can be maintained, and to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom.”

That laudable aim rings increasingly hollow today. The organisation itself and its aims have been sidelined by a powerful and bullying United States, supported by its supine Nato allies.

Why is there not a stronger worldwide movement against war and the weapons industries? And why is there not more pressure to reinvigorate the United Nations as a peace-keeping force?

Wars and the preparation for war eat up enormous amounts of human energy, talent, and irreplaceable raw materials; it destroys civilisations and infrastructure. Without all past wars, our world could veritably be an earthly paradise, building on the achievements of each generation rather than destroying them as we have done.

Today, capitalism is one of the chief motors of war — but the resort to war throughout history cannot be blamed on capitalism. It may not conform to a traditional Marxist interpretation of history, but it does seem as if we humans have a rogue gene in our make-up which drives us to war.

How else can we explain it? Would that also explain the obsession (particularly of young boys) with war games and videos about war?

Today, we have ongoing wars throughout the world: Ethiopia, Ukraine, Kashmir, Myanmar, Sudan, Afghanistan, central Africa and the Middle East.

According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (Sipri), sales of arms and military services by the industry’s 100 largest companies totalled $531 billion in 2020 — an increase of 1.3 per cent in real terms compared with the previous year.

British manufacturers exported £11bn worth of arms during 2019 — the second-highest figure on record. According to Department of International Trade figures, British exports also exceeded those of Russia and France for the second year in a row, placing Britain number two in the global rankings behind the US.

Large defence companies are seeing their share prices rocket as investors anticipate the impact of the war on profits. Thales shares have risen by 35 per cent since the invasion, while BAE Systems shares are up 32 per cent. Lockheed Martin has seen an increase of 14 per cent and AeroVironment 63 per cent.

Nato countries have been sending Ukraine military equipment worth more than £6.4bn, while European countries have pledged to spend an extra £170bn on defence in the coming years. The US has already approved a $9bn spending package to replenish supplies sent to Ukraine now and in the future.

Since the invasion, at least 15 European countries have announced plans for increased defence spending. The additional commitments are worth at least £170bn, the most significant being Germany’s pledge to spend an extra £85bn in the coming years. But the EU was already spending much more than Russia on defence before the invasion of Ukraine.

Referencing that war, Siemon Wezeman, senior researcher at Sipri, asks: “Is Russia really the threat that we make it out, that you need to spend an enormous amount of money in addition to what you already spend?”

As a result of the climate crisis and widespread austerity measures, millions of families are living in abject poverty, such spending on arms is total lunacy and a massive war crime against humanity.

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
More from this author
fall
Book Review / 30 May 2025
30 May 2025

JOHN GREEN wades through a pessimistic prophesy that does not consider the need for radical change in political and social structures

CONTESTED HISTORY: The Neue Wache (“the New Watchhouse”) was rebuilt by the GDR in 1957 and reopened in 1960 as a Memorial to the Victims of Fascism and Militarism — then, in 1993, it was rededicated to the ‘victims of war and tyranny’
Features / 26 May 2025
26 May 2025

JOHN GREEN observes how Berlin’s transformation from socialist aspiration to imperial nostalgia mirrors Germany’s dangerous trajectory under Chancellor Merz — a BlackRock millionaire and anti-communist preparing for a new war with Russia

221
Film of the week / 1 May 2025
1 May 2025

JOHN GREEN recommends a German comedy that celebrates the old GDR values of solidarity, community and a society not dominated by consumerism

Mural depicting the symbol of the revolution - a soldier with a carnation in the barrel of his gun; People celebrating on top of a tank in Lisbon during the Carnation Revolution of April 25 1974 / Pics: IsmailKupeli/CC; Public domain
Books / 24 April 2025
24 April 2025

JOHN GREEN welcomes an insider account of the achievements and failures of the transition to democracy in Portugal

Similar stories
Defence ministers (L to R) ) Romania’s Angel Tilvar, Estonia’s Hanno Pevkur, Luxembourg’s Yuriko Backes, Belgium’s Theo Francken and Germany’s Boris Pistorius and Bulgaria’s Atanas Zapryanov at a meeting of EU defence ministers at the European Council building in Brussels on May 20 2025
Militarism / 31 May 2025
31 May 2025

In the conclusion of his two-part article, PETER MERTENS reveals that while global military spending hits $2.7 trillion with European arms company profits soaring 1,000%, €1 invested in hospitals creates 2.5 times more jobs than weapons

 

 

Servicemen stand at the end of the Steadfast Dart 2025 exerc
Editorial: / 23 February 2025
23 February 2025
Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer and his wife Victoria
Editorial: / 10 July 2024
10 July 2024