Skip to main content
Fixing social security in the aftermath of Covid-19: why the UC £20 uplift is not enough
The Covid-19 pandemic has exposed the flaws and inadequacies of the benefit system and its unacceptably low payment rates, writes ANITA BELLOWS
Foodbank

WHILE ministers have hailed Universal Credit (UC) as a success for not buckling under the unprecedented number of claimants made redundant, to make this work the DWP had to introduce a series of measures stripping UC of some of its core components such as conditionality and injecting more flexibility and generosity into the system.

This implicitly acknowledged that benefits are too low, too complex to claim and are not received in a timely manner: the UC £20 uplift,  suspending the Minimum Income Floor, increasing the Local Housing Allowance Rate, expediting payments etc.

This uplift has been described as a lifeline by claimants, DPOs, charities and other organisations, but while the government is now considering withdrawing it, it has also been shown to be widely insufficient to cover the living costs borne by claimants.

According to the Resolution Foundation, of the more than three million additional claimants since last March, 31 per cent had either taken out new loans or seen their existing debts increase and 61 per cent cent expected to struggle or to fall behind on their bills in the coming three months — around double the national average.

  • On food and food deliveries. 54 per cent of surveyed disabled people said these costs had increased significantly.
     
  • On utilities, as disabled people had to spend more time at home, which has had an impact on their energy consumption. 53 per cent of disabled claimants said these costs had increased significantly and 67 per cent have had to go without essential items at some point during the pandemic.
     
  • On transport, as disabled people were trying to avoid public transport, or sharing cars, they had to rely on taxis to attend essential appointments.
     
  • On healthcare, to compensate for cancelled treatments or absence of treatment and addressing their worsening health as a result.
     
  • On internet costs. Disabled people were more likely to be digitally excluded or non-regular internet users and had to bear additional costs when almost all aspects of daily life moved online with the pandemic.
Donate to the Fighting Fund
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
Similar stories
protest
Features / 31 March 2025
31 March 2025
The economic value of disability benefits far outweighs their cost, argues Dr DYLAN MURPHY
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall leaves Downing Stree
Features / 24 March 2025
24 March 2025
Any positives from the government’s green paper proposals are vastly overshadowed by the scale of the cuts to vulnerable low-income households, argues JENNY RATHBONE MS
‘TAKING THE MICKEY’: Secretary of State for Work and Pen
Features / 16 February 2025
16 February 2025
Social security is lagging further and further behind inflation and our government quite simply does not care, argues Dr DYLAN MURPHY