Skip to main content
Work with the NEU
‘Capitalists tend to adopt technologies only as and when they suit their purposes’
LYNNE WALSH reports on the Future of Work event at the weekend, which saw a panel of expert speakers discuss automation, deskilling and the effects of Covid-19 on the workplace
PRONE TO MALFUNCTION: Prime Minister Boris Johnson plays with a robot during the UK-Africa Investment Summit in London earlier this year

IN THE week which saw an international report warning that the pandemic would continue to drive down wages, a panel of expert speakers focused on the Future of Work.
 
Against a backdrop of the International Labour Organisation (ILO) data showing that the crisis was “likely to inflict massive downward pressure on wages in the near future,” the Communist Party of Britain brought together activists and academics to take a forensic look at the causes of low wages, precarious work and shoddy treatment of workers.
 
Launching the ILO report last week, director-general Guy Ryder said: “The growth in inequality created by the Covid-19 crisis threatens a legacy of poverty and social and economic instability that would be devastating. 

“Our recovery strategy must be human-centred. We need adequate wage policies that take into account the sustainability of jobs and enterprises, and also address inequalities and the need to sustain demand. 

“If we are going to build a better future we must also deal with some uncomfortable questions about why jobs with high social value, such as carers and teachers, are very often linked to low pay.”
 
A key focus at the online seminar was the “gig economy,” that spurious phrase aimed at hoodwinking workers into notions that they are more in control of their labour. In reality, it has meant insecurity, stress, ill-health and penury for many.
 
Dr Leonardo Impett, specialist in artificial intelligence (AI) and currently assistant professor of computer science at the University of Durham, brought a Marxist perspective to the way that tomorrow’s world of work is being steered.
 
Debunking some popular beliefs about the use of AI — and the ability of robots — Impett said that the media’s shorthand use of the term AI actually referred to “machine learning.”
 
This was how computers or robots learned from experience, either from hand-labelled examples given to them — supervised learning — or their own past mistakes — reinforcement learning.
 
“That second one is only of any use in cases where you know if you’ve won or lost, like if you’re playing a chess game or tennis, say. 

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
Similar stories
BRAVE BNEW WORLD? Keir Starmer at the London Tech Week conference at London's Olympia, where he announced the TechFirst programme for secondary school pupils to be taught skills in artificial intelligence (AI) as part of a drive to put the technological power
Features / 4 April 2026
4 April 2026

In the second and final part of his article MIKE SCOTT posits that if we don’t control AI while we’ve got the chance, we could be signing the death warrant for our children and grandchildren

A general view of The Chat GPT website
Features / 3 April 2026
3 April 2026

MIKE SCOTT assesses the AI threat to jobs in the first of a pair of articles on the problems it poses

COST CONTROL MODE: Health Secretary Wes Streeting during a visit to NHS National Operations Centre in London on July 25 2025
Features / 18 September 2025
18 September 2025

Politicians who continue to welcome contracts with US companies without considering the risks and consequences of total dependency in the years to come are undermining the raison d’etre of the NHS, argues Dr JOHN PUNTIS

BRAVE NEW WORLD? Annual British Educational Training and Technology conference in London, January 2025, where Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson set out plans to use technology to ‘modernise’ the education system, support teachers and ‘deliver’ for pupils
Technology / 27 June 2025
27 June 2025

NICOLA SARAH HAWKINS explains how an under-regulated introduction of AI into education is already exacerbating inequalities