Skip to main content
Gifts from The Morning Star
Deaf chief executive loses challenge to Access to Work cap
Sam Tobin is at the High Court

DEAF chief executive David Buxton lost a legal challenge yesterday to a cap on payments to help cover the extra costs of working with a disability.

Mr Buxton uses British sign language (BSL) as his first language and requires full-time interpretation, historically provided under the access to work (ATW) scheme, to do his job.

He needed increased support when he joined “hearing-led organisation” Action on Disability in 2017, but the £42,100 annual cap meant Mr Buxton could only be supported by an interpreter for three days a week.

In June, the High Court heard that ATW was “a hugely effective means of enabling disabled people to enter into and stay in employment” and that the cap disproportionately affected deaf people.

Mr Justice Kerr, however, dismissed Mr Buxton’s case, ruling that the Department for Work & Pensions had not breached the public-sector equality duty and that any indirect discrimination caused by the cap was a “proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.”

Mr Buxton said the government decision to raise the cap before the hearing was “a great result, making a lot more money available to deaf and disabled people.”

But he added that the Equality Act did not properly protect deaf people, saying: “The government supports the economies of cost over our basic human rights, therefore we have to campaign for the Equality Act to be strengthened.”

His solicitor Louise Whitfield from Deighton Pierce Glynn said Mr Buxton would not appeal but would focus on a judicial review on the inclusion of deaf people on jury service to “further test the government to show its commitment to the spirit of the Equality Act.”

The Department for Work & Pensions has been approached for comment.

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
More from this author
Britain / 17 June 2021
17 June 2021
All eight claimants say Labour acted unfairly by failing to close investigations or revoke their suspension or expulsion
Similar stories
UTTER REJECTION: A contingent od disabled protesters move to
Features / 31 March 2025
31 March 2025
The economic value of disability benefits far outweighs their cost, argues Dr DYLAN MURPHY
AN IMPERATIVE CALL: Haldane Society of Socialist Lawyers pro
Features / 11 January 2025
11 January 2025
PROFESSOR ANSELM ELDERGILL suggests ways in which the government can boost legal aid and support
Poverty / 3 November 2024
3 November 2024