Skip to main content
Work with the NEU
Vulnerability proof thrown out by Court
Campaigners celebrate landmark case win

CAMPAIGNERS cried victory yesterday after the Supreme Court ruled in favour of single homeless people no longer having to prove they are more vulnerable than others in order to get support. The “landmark decision” came after a long-running legal challenge to the way councils process housing applications.

Until recently councils would request candidates to pass the Pereira Test, which assessed how “vulnerable” a homeless person is. But charities Crisis and Shelter considered it a “scandal” that any homeless person would be deemed not vulnerable as a result.

Crisis chief executive Jon Sparkes said: “During our intervention in this case, the court heard evidence of just how horrific a homeless person’s life has to be before they qualify for council help. “They are over nine times more likely to commit suicide and 13 times more likely to be a victim of violence.

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
Similar stories
Campaigners protest outside Parliament in Westminster, London, ahead of a debate in the House of Commons on assisted dying, April 29, 2024
Opinion / 27 February 2026
27 February 2026

Evidence to peers from medical leaders, patient safety officials and the children’s commissioner has intensified fears that the Bill’s safeguards are inadequate, writes ADAM JAMES POLLOCK

MORE QUESTIONS THAN ANSWERS: AI Truth Machine / LIT Law Lab,
Features / 12 April 2025
12 April 2025
ANSELM ELDERGILL asks whether artificial intelligence may decide legal cases in the future, in place of human judges, and how AI could reshape the legal landscape